Thornberry v. Chau et al
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/12/2018 ADOPTING 9 findings and recommendations in full. Claims against defendants Chau, Smith, and Bobbala are DISMISSED as duplicative. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANIEL LEE THORNBERRY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:18-cv-0094-WBS-EFB P
v.
ORDER
JAMES CHAU, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On May 3, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
20
21
were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to
23
the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed May 3, 2018, are adopted in full; and
27
28
/////
1
1
2. Claims against defendants Chau, Smith, and Bobbala are dismissed as duplicative.
2
3
Dated: June 12, 2018
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?