Thornberry v. Chau et al
Filing
48
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/8/19 ADOPTING 45 Findings and Recommendations in full. DISMISSING Plaintiff's second amended Complaint 42 ) without leave to amend for failure to state a cognizable claim; CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANIEL LEE THORNBERRY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:18-cv-0094-WBS-EFB P
v.
ORDER
JAMES CHAU, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On July 23, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
20
21
were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Despite an extension of time,
23
plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed July 23, 2019, are adopted in full;
27
28
/////
1
1
2
3
4
2. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (ECF No. 42) is DISMISSED without leave to
amend for failure to state a cognizable claim; and
3. The Clerk is directed to close the case.
Dated: October 8, 2019
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?