Miller v. Equifax, Inc. et al
Filing
27
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/2/2018 ORDERING the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiffs complaint is hereby EXTENDED to 6/1/2018. No other deadlines shall be affected by this Order. (Washington, S)
1 MARK D. LONERGAN (State Bar No. 143622)
REBECCA S. SAELAO (State Bar No. 222731)
2 ALISA A. GIVENTAL (State Bar No. 273551)
SEVERSON & WERSON
3 A Professional Corporation
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600
4 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 398-3344
5 Facsimile: (415) 956-0439
6 ROCHELLE L. SMITH (State Bar No. 316225)
SEVERSON & WERSON
7 A Professional Corporation
The Atrium
8 19100 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 700
Irvine, California 92612
9 Telephone: (949) 442-7110
Facsimile: (949) 442-7118
10
Attorneys for Defendants
11 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION — SACRAMENTO
DIVISION
15
16 CRYSTAL MILLER,
17
18
Case No. 2:18-CV-00126-JAM-CKD
Hon. John A. Mendez
Plaintiff,
vs.
19 EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC,; EQUIFAX, INC.; BANK OF
20 AMERICA, N.A.; HARLEY DAVIDSON
CREDIT CORPORATION, WELLS FARGO
21 BANK, N.A., AND DOES 1 THROUGH 100
INCLUSIVE,
22
Defendant.
23
JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND
DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT AND ORDER
Complaint Served:
Orig. Response Deadline:
New Response Deadline:
New. Response Deadline:
Prop Response Deadline:
February 12, 2018
March 5, 2018
April 2, 2018
May 2, 2018
June 1, 2018
24
Pursuant to United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Civil Local Rule
25
144(a), which requires Court approval for any extension to respond to the initial complaint beyond
26
28 days, plaintiff Crystal Miller (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
27
(“Defendant”), hereby jointly move for an extension for Defendant to file its responsive pleading
28
07685.1986/11197945.1
JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1 based on the following facts:
2
1.
Plaintiff served the Complaint on February 12, 2018;
3
2.
Defendant’s deadline to respond to the Complaint was March 5, 2018;
4
3.
Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a stipulation to postpone the response deadline
5 to April 2, 2018;
6
4.
Plaintiff and Defendant are engaged in settlement discussions and jointly moved to
7 extend the response deadline to May 2, 2018 , the request was granted;
8
5.
Plaintiff and Defendant are continuing settlement discussions and believe that they
9 can resolve their dispute if an additional 30 day extension is granted by the Court.
10
6.
Plaintiff and Defendant therefore move jointly to extend for the third time
11 Defendant’s deadline to respond to the Complaint to June 1, 2018.
12
DATED: May 2, 2018
SAGARIA LAW, P.C.
13
14
By:
15
/s/ Elliott W. Gale
Elliot W. Gale
16
Attorneys for Plaintiff CRYSTAL MILLER
17
18 DATED: May 2, 2018
19
SEVERSON & WERSON
A Professional Corporation
20
By:
21
/s/ Rochelle L.Smith
Rochelle L. Smith
22
Attorneys for Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK,
N.A.
23
24
I, Rochelle L. Smith, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to
25
file this Stipulation. I hereby attest that Elliot Gale has concurred in this filing.
26
27
By:
/s/ Rochelle L. Smith
28
07685.1986/11197945.1
2
JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
ORDER
Pursuant to the joint motion of plaintiff Crystal Miller and defendant Wells Fargo Bank,
3 N.A., and good cause appearing, the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint is
4 hereby extended to June 1, 2018. No other deadlines shall be affected by this Order.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 DATED: May 2, 2018
7
/s/ John A. Mendez________
HON. JOHN A MENDEZ.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
07685.1986/11197945.1
3
JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?