Gleason v. Neuschmid

Filing 63

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/11/19 AFFIRMING the order of the Magistrate Judge filed 11/20/18 (ECF No. 48 ) and GRANTING Plaintiff a 30-day extension of time within which to file his second amended complaint. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STANLEY GLEASON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:18-cv-0135 MCE CKD P v. ORDER R. NEUSCHMID, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On December 6, 2018, Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, filed a 17 18 request for reconsideration (ECF No. 51) of the Magistrate Judge’s order filed November 20, 19 2018 (ECF No. 48) dismissing Plaintiff’s amended complaint with leave to file a second amended 20 complaint. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a Magistrate Judge’s orders shall be upheld 21 unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds that 22 it does not appear that the Magistrate Judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. 23 ///// 24 ///// 25 ///// 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the 2 Magistrate Judge filed November 20, 2018 (ECF No. 48), is AFFIRMED, and Plaintiff is granted 3 a 30-day extension of time within which to file his second amended complaint. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 11, 2019 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?