Taylor v. Lewis et al

Filing 21

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/18/2019 ADOPTING 17 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING Defendants Lewis, Bobbala, Sahota, and Chaiken. This action proceeds on plaintiff's 12 First Amended Complaint against defendant Ma only. (York, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOE TAYLOR, 12 No. 2:18-CV-0149-JAM-DMC-P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 J. LEWIS, et al., ORDER 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 17 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 Eastern District of California local rules. On October 3, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 20 21 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 22 objections within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations 23 have been filed. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 3, 2019, are adopted in 4 2. Defendants Lewis, Bobbala, Sahota, and Chaiken are dismissed; and 5 3. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s first amended complaint against 3 6 full; defendant Ma only. 7 8 9 10 DATED: December 18, 2019 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?