Taylor v. Lewis et al
Filing
21
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/18/2019 ADOPTING 17 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING Defendants Lewis, Bobbala, Sahota, and Chaiken. This action proceeds on plaintiff's 12 First Amended Complaint against defendant Ma only. (York, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOE TAYLOR,
12
No. 2:18-CV-0149-JAM-DMC-P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
J. LEWIS, et al.,
ORDER
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to
17
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
Eastern District of California local rules.
On October 3, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations
20
21
herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file
22
objections within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations
23
have been filed.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The findings and recommendations filed October 3, 2019, are adopted in
4
2.
Defendants Lewis, Bobbala, Sahota, and Chaiken are dismissed; and
5
3.
This action proceeds on plaintiff’s first amended complaint against
3
6
full;
defendant Ma only.
7
8
9
10
DATED: December 18, 2019
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?