Singanonh v. Susanville Prison
Filing
53
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/2/2021 ADOPTING IN FULL 52 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 44 Motion for Summary Judgment and DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment and close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Tupolo, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TIENGKHAM SINGANONH,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:18-CV-0159-WBS-DMC-P
v.
ORDER
K. LANGSLET, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42
17
18
U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern
19
District of California local rules.
On December 9, 2020, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations
20
21
herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file
22
objections within the time specified therein. ECF No. 52. The Magistrate Judge recommended
23
granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Id. Plaintiff did not file objections.
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
3
are adopted in full;
2.
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 44) is GRANTED;
3.
4
5
The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 52) filed December 9, 2020,
The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close the above
and
6
7
captioned file.
8
Dated: March 2, 2021
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?