Shannon v. Ikegbu et al

Filing 24

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 04/06/20 ORDERING the Clerk is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this case. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed. Assigned and referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL TYRONE SHANNON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:18-cv-0161-EFB P v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DR. IKEGBU, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 17 18 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 12, 2020, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 1915A. The court found service appropriate as to defendant Ikegbu, and granted 20 plaintiff thirty days to either return documents necessary to effect service of process on that 21 defendant, or to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies identified in the other claims. 22 ECF No. 20. The order warned plaintiff that failure to comply would result in a recommendation 23 that this action be dismissed. The time for acting has passed and plaintiff has not submitted the 24 appropriate materials necessary for service or an amended complaint. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to randomly assign a United States 25 26 District Judge to this case. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 2 Further, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E. D. Cal. L.R. 110. 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 4 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 5 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 6 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 7 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 8 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. 9 Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 10 DATED: April 6, 2020. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?