Avila v. McMahon et al

Filing 45

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/27/18 ADOPTING in full 39 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and GRANTING 4 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to amend limited to claim(s) against the County. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID ANTHONY AVILA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:18-cv-00163 JAM AC v. ORDER M.D. MCMAHON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a 17 18 United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On July 17, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 19 20 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 21 findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 39. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 17, 2018, are adopted in full; 26 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 2 2. The County’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 4) is granted, and plaintiff is granted leave to amend. Leave to amend is limited to plaintiff’s claim(s) against the County. 3 4 DATED: September 27, 2018 5 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 6 7 8 Avil0163.801 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?