Avila v. McMahon et al
Filing
68
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/02/19 GRANTING 66 Request; the Discovery and Scheduling Order is AMENDED as follows: Rule 26 expert disclosure: 01/10/20; rebuttal expert disclosure: 01/24/20; expert discovery completion: 02/21/20. All other dates remain the same. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID ANTHONY AVILA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:18-cv-00163 JAM AC (PS)
v.
ORDER
M.D. McMAHON, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the
18
undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On November 26,
19
2019, defendant filed a Request to Modify the Pretrial Scheduling Order, asking the Court to
20
extend the Rule 26 expert disclosure, rebuttal expert disclosure and discovery cut-off deadline to
21
complete plaintiff’s deposition prior to Rule 26 expert disclosure. ECF No. 66. Defendant cited
22
plaintiff’s failure to respond to communications as both the reason the extension is necessary and
23
the reason the parties did not present a stipulation. ECF No. 66-1 at ¶ 4.
GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, defendant’s request is granted. The
24
25
Discovery and Scheduling Order is hereby amended as follows: Rule 26 expert disclosure date is
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
January 10, 24 2020; rebuttal expert disclosure is January 24, 2020; expert discovery completion
2
date is February 21, 2020. All other dates remain the same.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: December 2, 2019
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?