Avila v. McMahon et al

Filing 68

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/02/19 GRANTING 66 Request; the Discovery and Scheduling Order is AMENDED as follows: Rule 26 expert disclosure: 01/10/20; rebuttal expert disclosure: 01/24/20; expert discovery completion: 02/21/20. All other dates remain the same. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID ANTHONY AVILA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:18-cv-00163 JAM AC (PS) v. ORDER M.D. McMAHON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the 18 undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On November 26, 19 2019, defendant filed a Request to Modify the Pretrial Scheduling Order, asking the Court to 20 extend the Rule 26 expert disclosure, rebuttal expert disclosure and discovery cut-off deadline to 21 complete plaintiff’s deposition prior to Rule 26 expert disclosure. ECF No. 66. Defendant cited 22 plaintiff’s failure to respond to communications as both the reason the extension is necessary and 23 the reason the parties did not present a stipulation. ECF No. 66-1 at ¶ 4. GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, defendant’s request is granted. The 24 25 Discovery and Scheduling Order is hereby amended as follows: Rule 26 expert disclosure date is 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 January 10, 24 2020; rebuttal expert disclosure is January 24, 2020; expert discovery completion 2 date is February 21, 2020. All other dates remain the same. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: December 2, 2019 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?