Avila v. McMahon et al

Filing 93

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/21/2020 ADOPTING 90 Findings and Recommendations in full, GRANTING 79 Motion for Summary Judgment, and DENYING as MOOT 83 , 85 Motions. CASE CLOSED.(Huang, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID ANTHONY AVILA, 12 13 14 No. 2:18-cv-0163 JAM AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER M.D. MCMAHON, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff proceeds in this action in pro per. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On October 16, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 21 and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 90. Plaintiff has filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 91. Defendant filed an opposition to 23 the objections. ECF No. 92. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 16, 2020, are adopted in full; and 28 2. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 79) is GRANTED and plaintiff’s 1 1 pending motions (ECF Nos. 83 and 85) are DENIED as MOOT. 2 3 4 5 DATED: December 21, 2020 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?