Avila v. McMahon et al
Filing
93
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/21/2020 ADOPTING 90 Findings and Recommendations in full, GRANTING 79 Motion for Summary Judgment, and DENYING as MOOT 83 , 85 Motions. CASE CLOSED.(Huang, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID ANTHONY AVILA,
12
13
14
No. 2:18-cv-0163 JAM AC PS
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
M.D. MCMAHON,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff proceeds in this action in pro per. The matter was referred to a United States
Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On October 16, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings
21
and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 90. Plaintiff has filed
22
objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 91. Defendant filed an opposition to
23
the objections. ECF No. 92.
24
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
1. The findings and recommendations filed October 16, 2020, are adopted in full; and
28
2. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 79) is GRANTED and plaintiff’s
1
1
pending motions (ECF Nos. 83 and 85) are DENIED as MOOT.
2
3
4
5
DATED: December 21, 2020
/s/ John A. Mendez
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?