Slaton v. I.R.S.
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/6/2018 DENYING 4 Motion to Proceed IFP. Within 28 days of this order, plaintiffs shall pay the applicable filing fee. However, the court will entertain a request for a reasonable extension of time to pay the fee should such an extension be necessary. Failure to timely pay the filing fee, or timely request an extension of time to do so, may result in dismissal of the action. (Washington, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SHERYL DENISE SLATON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:18-cv-00189-TLN-CKD (PS)
v.
ORDER
I.R.S.,
15
Defendant.
16
Presently pending before the court is plaintiff’s amended motion for leave to proceed in
17
18
forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.1 (ECF No. 4.) The court previously denied
19
plaintiff’s first motion to for leave to proceed in forma pauperis because plaintiff’s affidavit in
20
support of the first motion was incomplete. (See ECF No. 3.)
The affidavit in support of the amended motion indicates that plaintiff’s net wages are
21
22
$779.38 every two weeks, i.e., $20,263.88 annually. (ECF No. 4 at 1.) In addition, plaintiff
23
attests that she also receives $937.00 in Social Security benefits once a month, i.e., $11,244.00
24
annually. (Id.) Therefore, plaintiff’s total net annual income is $31,507.88.
Plaintiff also indicates that her minor granddaughter is dependent on her for support. (Id.
25
26
at 2.) According to the United States Department of Health and Human Services, the 2018
27
28
1
This case was referred to the undersigned pursuant to E.D. Cal. L.R. 302(c)(21).
1
1
poverty guideline for a household of two, in the contiguous United States, is $16,460. See
2
https://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty-guidelines (last visited April 4, 2018). Thus, plaintiff’s gross
3
household income is well in excess of 100%, and approaching 200%, of the 2018 poverty
4
guidelines for a similarly situated individual.
5
Moreover, while plaintiff lists monthly expenses of approximately $1,535.00, her monthly
6
net income, between wages and benefits, is approximately $2,625.66. (See ECF No. 4.)
7
Therefore, according to plaintiff’s own affidavit, she receives at least $1,000.00 in excess of her
8
expenses, every month.
9
Presently, a filing fee of $400.00 is required to commence a civil action in this court. The
10
court may authorize the commencement of an action “without prepayment of fees or security
11
therefor” by a person that is unable to pay such fees or provide security therefor. 28 U.S.C. §
12
1915(a)(1). Here, the court cannot find that plaintiff is unable to pay, or provide security for, the
13
court filing fee. To be sure, the court is sympathetic to the fact that plaintiff does not have a large
14
income by any measure, and that plaintiff also has several expenses to contend with. However,
15
numerous litigants in this court have significant monthly expenditures, and may have to make
16
difficult choices as to which expenses to incur, which expenses to reduce or eliminate, and how to
17
apportion their income between such expenses and litigating an action in federal court. Such
18
difficulties in themselves do not amount to indigency.
19
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
20
1.
21
2. Within 28 days of this order, plaintiffs shall pay the applicable filing fee. However,
22
the court will entertain a request for a reasonable extension of time to pay the fee
23
should such an extension be necessary.
24
/////
25
/////
26
/////
27
/////
28
Plaintiff’s amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 4) is denied.
/////
2
1
3. Failure to timely pay the filing fee, or timely request an extension of time to do so,
2
may result in dismissal of the action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
3
41(b).
4
Dated: April 6, 2018
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
14/ps.18.189.slaton v. irs.odifp
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?