Parnell v. Win et al

Filing 10

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/03/18 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RICKY PARNELL,

12
13
14

No. 2:18-cv-0220 KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS

DR. K. WIN, DR. CHIN,

15

Defendants.

16
17

By an order filed February 21, 2018, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to

18

the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants. That

19

thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s order.

20
21
22
23
24

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is
directed to assign a district judge to this case; and
IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ.
P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge

25

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

26

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

27

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and

28

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time
1

1

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th

2

Cir. 1991).

3

Dated: April 3, 2018

4
5
/parn0220.fusm

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2