Banks v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 3/13/2018 TRANSFERRING this matter to the USDC for the Central District of California. CASE CLOSED.(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
FREDERICK BANKS, as “next friend”
for David Turpin and Louise Turpin,
No. 2:18-CV-0281-CMK-P
12
Petitioner,
13
vs.
ORDER
14
15
16
17
18
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
AGENCY, et al.,
Respondents.
/
Petitioner, who appears to purport to be filing on behalf of others, brings this
19
petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. According to petitioner, the
20
Turpins are challenging a pre-trial detention order issued by the Riverside County Superior
21
Court. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 2241(d), courts in both the district of conviction and the district of
22
confinement have concurrent jurisdiction over applications for habeas corpus filed by state
23
prisoners. See Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973). In this case,
24
petitioner appears to allege that he and/or the Turpins are confined in Youngstown, Ohio.
25
However, because the pre-trial detention order was issued in Riverside County, which is within
26
the boundaries of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, this
1
1
2
3
matter should be transferred to that court. See id. at 499 n.15.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the
United States District Court for the Central District of California.
4
5
6
7
DATED: March 13, 2018
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?