Morris v. Arnold
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 7/18/2018 ORDERING if petitioner wishes to file a traverse, he shall do so within 30 days. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANTONIO MORRIS,
12
No. 2:18-cv-0292 JAM DB P
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
ERIC ARNOLD,
15
ORDER
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for a
18
writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In a document filed on June 20, 2018, petitioner
19
requested a copy of the “Amenability Report,” which respondent refers to in his answer. (ECF
20
No. 19.) In addition, petitioner requested an extension of time to file the traverse and
21
appointment of counsel. (ECF Nos. 14, 19.) In an order filed July 11, 2018, the court ordered
22
respondent to respond to petitioner’s request for a copy of the Amenability Report, denied
23
petitioner’s request for appointment of counsel, and granted petitioner’s request for an extension
24
of time. (ECF No. 20.) The court stated that it would set a due date for the traverse after it had
25
resolved the question of petitioner’s right to a copy of the Amenability Report.
26
On July 17, 2018, respondent filed a response to the court’s July 11 order. (ECF No. 21.)
27
Respondent appears to have provided both the court and petitioner with a copy of the Amenability
28
Report that petitioner seeks. Accordingly, the court will set a due date for the traverse.
1
1
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that if petitioner wishes to file a
2
traverse, he shall do so within thirty (30) days of the date of this order.
3
DATED: July 18, 2018
4
5
/s/ DEBORAH BARNES
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
DLB:9
DLB1/prisoner-habeas/morr0292.trav eot
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?