Arzaga v. Santiago et al

Filing 45

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/02/20 GRANTING 44 motion to opt out and the stay of this action is lifted. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DANIEL ARZAGA,

12

No. 2:18-cv-0313 KJM KJN P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

ORDER

E. SANTIAGO, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner, appears pro se with a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C.

17
18

§ 1983. Plaintiff paid the filing fee. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s amended complaint

19

alleging Eighth Amendment claims against defendants E. Santiago, Gisler (sued as “G. Donna”),

20

Haluik, A. Victoriano, and S. Pak pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). (ECF

21

No. 16.) On May 29, 2020, defendants Gisler and Pak filed a motion to opt out of the post-

22

screening ADR project.1 After reviewing the motion, the court finds good cause to grant

23

defendants’ motion.

24

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

25

1. Defendants’ motion to opt out (ECF No. 44) is granted and the stay of this action is

26

lifted; and

27
28

1

Service of process on the remaining defendants remains outstanding.
1

1
2

2. By separate order, the court will set a schedule for this case.
Dated: June 2, 2020

3
4

/arza0313.optout

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2