Saldana v. Spearman et al
Filing
37
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/25/20 ORDERING that within 14 days of service of this order, defendant shall notify the court whether he believes a settlement conference would be beneficial at this time. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SAMUEL SALDANA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:18-cv-0319 AC P
v.
ORDER
M.E. SPEARMAN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42
18
U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before this court is plaintiff’s request for another settlement conference.
19
ECF No. 34.
The parties initially participated in a settlement conference before Judge Newman on
20
21
October 16, 2019, as part of the Post-Screening ADR Project. ECF No. 27. However, the case
22
did not settle at that time. Id. Before the court determines whether to send this case for another
23
settlement conference, defendant shall be required to notify the court whether he believes a
24
settlement conference would be beneficial at this time.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days of service of this
25
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
order, defendant shall notify the court whether he believes a settlement conference would be
2
beneficial at this time.
3
DATED: March 25, 2020
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?