Saldana v. Spearman et al

Filing 37

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/25/20 ORDERING that within 14 days of service of this order, defendant shall notify the court whether he believes a settlement conference would be beneficial at this time. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SAMUEL SALDANA,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:18-cv-0319 AC P

v.

ORDER

M.E. SPEARMAN, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42

18

U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before this court is plaintiff’s request for another settlement conference.

19

ECF No. 34.
The parties initially participated in a settlement conference before Judge Newman on

20
21

October 16, 2019, as part of the Post-Screening ADR Project. ECF No. 27. However, the case

22

did not settle at that time. Id. Before the court determines whether to send this case for another

23

settlement conference, defendant shall be required to notify the court whether he believes a

24

settlement conference would be beneficial at this time.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days of service of this

25
26

////

27

////

28

////
1

1

order, defendant shall notify the court whether he believes a settlement conference would be

2

beneficial at this time.

3

DATED: March 25, 2020

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2