Saldana v. Spearman et al

Filing 41

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/10/20 DENYING 34 Motion for a second settlement conference. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SAMUEL SALDANA,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:18-cv-0319 AC P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

M.E. SPEARMAN, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

After plaintiff requested that the court set this case for a second settlement conference,

18

ECF No. 34, defendant was ordered to advise the court whether he believed a settlement

19

conference would be beneficial at this time, ECF No. 37. Defendant has now responded that he

20

does not believe a second settlement conference would be beneficial at this time. ECF No. 40.

21

The request for a settlement conference will therefore be denied. Plaintiff is still free to discuss

22

possible settlement with defendant’s counsel without a settlement conference. However, any

23

such communications should not be filed with the court.

24

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for a second settlement

25

conference, ECF No. 34, is denied.

26

DATED: April 10, 2020

27
28