Barrera et al v. City of Woodland et al

Filing 48

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/30/2020 STAYING all discovery in this case until after the district court has ruled on counsel's motion to withdraw. Within 30 days after the withdrawal motion has been resolved, the parties shall file with the court a joint statement with proposed discovery deadlines. (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

DANIEL BARRERA, et al.,

11

Plaintiffs,

12
13

No. 2:18–cv–329–JAM–KJN
ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY
(ECF No. 40.)

v.
CITY OF WOODLAND, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15
On July 30, 2020, the court entertained arguments from the parties regarding plaintiff’s

16
17

motion to extend discovery. (ECF No. 40.) Attorney Patrick Buelna appeared on behalf of

18

plaintiffs, and Attorney Derick Konz appeared on behalf of defendants.
For the reasons stated at the hearing, the court orders all discovery in this case is

19
20

STAYED until after the district court has ruled on counsel’s motion to withdraw. Within 30 days

21

after the withdrawal motion has been resolved, the parties shall file with the court a joint

22

statement with proposed discovery deadlines.1

23

Dated: July 30, 2020

24
25

barr.329

26

1

27
28

Should the motion to withdraw be granted, and thereafter plaintiffs proceed without the aid of an
attorney, this joint statement shall be directed to the undersigned magistrate judge. However, if
plaintiffs will be represented by counsel (current or otherwise) after the motion to withdraw has
been resolved, this joint statement shall be directed to the assigned district judge.
1