Mobile Hi-Tech Wheels v. TWM Wholesale, LLC et al

Filing 37

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 12/29/2018 GRANTING 30 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants Response to Plaintiffs Statement of Undisputed Material Facts and Defendants Statement of Additional Undisputed Material F acts [ECF No. 28-1] is accepted as timely filed. On or before 12/18/2018, Plaintiff Mobile Hi-Tech Wheels may file an amended Reply in Support of Its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Opposition to Defendants Motion Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d) and amended Evidentiary Objections to Defendants Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MOBILE HI-TECH WHEELS,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Plaintiff,
vs.
TWM WHOLESALE, LLC and
TIRE & WHEEL MASTER, INC.;
TIRE & WHEEL MASTER, LLC;
USA WHEEL & TIRE OUTLET, INC.;
ASLAM PROPERTY, INC.;
HB COMMERCIAL, LLC; NADEEM ASLAM;
and AMMAD HUSSAIN,

Case No. 2:18-cv-00339-MCE-GGH
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO
SUPPLEMENT AND REQUEST FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME

Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Pursuant to Fed R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 144, and based on a finding of
excusable neglect, Defendants’ Unopposed Motion to Supplement and Request for Extension of
Time is GRANTED.
Defendants’ Response to Plaintiff’s Statement of Undisputed Material Facts and
Defendants’ Statement of Additional Undisputed Material Facts [ECF No. 28-1] is accepted as
timely filed.
On or before December 18, 2018, Plaintiff Mobile Hi-Tech Wheels may file an
amended Reply in Support of Its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Opposition to

1

Defendants’ Motion Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d) and amended Evidentiary Objections to

2

Defendants’ Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 29, 2018

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2