Alger v. FCA US LLC

Filing 12

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/10/2018 EXTENDING Time as follows: (1) Plaintiff shall file its SAC no later than 4/23/2018; (2) Defendant shall file its Answer or Motion to Dismiss in response to Plai ntiff's SAC no later than 5/14/2018; (3) If Defendant files a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's SAC, Plaintiff's Opposition shall be filed no later than 6/4/2018; (4) Any Reply in support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's SAC shall be filed no later than 6/18/2018; (5) The hearing date for any Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's SAC filed by the Defendant will be set for 6/25/2018. (York, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP James P. Feeney (219045) jfeeney@dykema.com Dommond E. Lonnie (142662) dlonnie@dykema.com Abirami Gnanadesigan (263375) agnanadesigan@dykema.com 333 South Grand Avenue Suite 2100 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 457-1800 Facsimile: (213) 457-1850 Attorneys for Defendant FCA US LLC f/k/a CHRYSLER GROUP LLC 333 S SOUTH GRAND AVENUE SUITE 2100 LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 SACRAMENTO DIVISION SHAWN ALGER as an individual and on behalf Case No. 2:18-cv-00360-MCE-EFB 14 of all others similarly situated, 15 16 Assigned to Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr. Plaintiff, vs. Courtroom: Courtroom 7, 14th floor 17 FCA US LLC f/k/a CHRYSLER GROUP LLC, a Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1 through 100, 18 inclusive , 19 Defendants. 20 21 STIPULATION AND APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE FILING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SETTING A BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON ANY MOTION TO DISMISS IN RESPONSE Complaint Filed: February 15, 2018 Trial Date: TBD 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE FILING OF SAC AND SETTING A BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00360-MCE-EFB 1 Plaintiff SHAWN ALGER, AS AN INDIVIDUAL AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS 2 SIMILARLY SITUATED (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant FCA US LLC, formerly known as 3 CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC (“Defendant”) (collectively the “Parties”), by and through their 4 attorneys of record in this case, hereby stipulate and request that the Court approve the filing of a 5 Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), and a briefing schedule for Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss 6 the SAC, if any. 7 This stipulation and application for extension of time is based on the following facts: 8 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed this action on or about February 15, 2018; 9 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) in this action on or about 333 S SOUTH GRAND AVENUE SUITE 2100 LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP 10 February 16, 2018; 11 WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), the Parties stipulated to a twenty-eight (28) day 12 extension of Defendant’s time to respond to the FAC up to and including April 10, 2018; 13 WHEREAS, the Parties met and conferred on April 5, 2018 and April 6, 2018 regarding 14 Plaintiff’s CLRA claims contained in the FAC; 15 WHEREAS, the Parties agree that, subject to Court approval, there is good cause and 16 efficiencies may be achieved for the parties and the Court by filing a SAC that addresses issues 17 raised as part of the parties’ meet and confer efforts. The parties also stipulate, agree and request 18 the following deadline for answering the SAC in the event Defendant does not to file a Motion to 19 Dismiss Plaintiff’s SAC or, in the alternative, a briefing schedule in the event Defendant files a 20 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s SAC. 21 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate as follows: 22 1. Plaintiff shall file its SAC no later than April 23, 2018. 23 2. Defendant shall file its Answer or Motion to Dismiss in response to Plaintiff’s SAC 24 25 no later than May 14, 2018. 3. 26 27 28 If Defendant files a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s SAC, Plaintiff’s Opposition shall be filed no later than June 4, 2018. 4. Any Reply in support of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s SAC shall be 2 STIPULATION AND APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE FILING OF SAC AND SETTING A BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00360-MCE-EFB 1 2 3 4 5 filed no later than June 18, 2018. 5. The hearing date for any Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s SAC filed by the Defendant will be set for June 25, 2018. Dated: April 9, 2018 6 DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP James P. Feeney Dommond E. Lonnie Abirami Gnanadesigan 7 8 By: /s/ Dommond E. Lonnie 9 James P. Feeney Dommond E. Lonnie Abirami Gnanadesigan Attorneys for Defendant FCA US LLC f/k/a CHRYSLER GROUP 333 S SOUTH GRAND AVENUE SUITE 2100 LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP 10 11 12 13 14 15 Dated: April 9, 2018 KERSHAW, COOK & TALLEY PC William A. Kershaw Stuart C. Talley Ian J. Barlow 16 17 By: /s/ Ian J. Barlow 18 (As authorized on April 9, 2018) William A. Kershaw Stuart C. Talley Ian J. Barlow Attorneys for PLAINTIFF AND THE PUTATIVE CLASS 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE FILING OF SAC AND SETTING A BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00360-MCE-EFB 1 2 3 4 5 6 ORDER The Court, having considered the Stipulation and Application for Extension of Time submitted herewith, and good cause appearing, hereby enters the following order: 1. Plaintiff shall file its SAC no later than April 23, 2018. 2. Defendant shall file its Answer or Motion to Dismiss in response to Plaintiff’s SAC 7 8 no later than May 14, 2018. 3. 9 333 S SOUTH GRAND AVENUE SUITE 2100 LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP 10 be filed no later than June 4, 2018. 4. 11 12 13 14 15 16 If Defendant files a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s SAC, Plaintiff’s Opposition shall Any Reply in support of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s SAC shall be filed no later than June 18, 2018. 5. The hearing date for any Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s SAC filed by the Defendant will be set for June 25, 2018. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 10, 2018 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE FILING OF SAC AND SETTING A BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00360-MCE-EFB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?