Alger v. FCA US LLC
Filing
12
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/10/2018 EXTENDING Time as follows: (1) Plaintiff shall file its SAC no later than 4/23/2018; (2) Defendant shall file its Answer or Motion to Dismiss in response to Plai ntiff's SAC no later than 5/14/2018; (3) If Defendant files a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's SAC, Plaintiff's Opposition shall be filed no later than 6/4/2018; (4) Any Reply in support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's SAC shall be filed no later than 6/18/2018; (5) The hearing date for any Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's SAC filed by the Defendant will be set for 6/25/2018. (York, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP
James P. Feeney (219045)
jfeeney@dykema.com
Dommond E. Lonnie (142662)
dlonnie@dykema.com
Abirami Gnanadesigan (263375)
agnanadesigan@dykema.com
333 South Grand Avenue
Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: (213) 457-1800
Facsimile: (213) 457-1850
Attorneys for Defendant
FCA US LLC f/k/a CHRYSLER GROUP LLC
333 S SOUTH GRAND AVENUE
SUITE 2100
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
SHAWN ALGER as an individual and on behalf
Case No. 2:18-cv-00360-MCE-EFB
14 of all others similarly situated,
15
16
Assigned to
Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.
Plaintiff,
vs.
Courtroom: Courtroom 7, 14th floor
17 FCA US LLC f/k/a CHRYSLER GROUP LLC, a
Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1 through 100,
18 inclusive ,
19
Defendants.
20
21
STIPULATION AND APPLICATION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME RE FILING
PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND SETTING A
BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON ANY
MOTION TO DISMISS IN RESPONSE
Complaint Filed: February 15, 2018
Trial Date: TBD
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE FILING OF SAC AND SETTING A BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00360-MCE-EFB
1
Plaintiff SHAWN ALGER, AS AN INDIVIDUAL AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS
2 SIMILARLY SITUATED (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant FCA US LLC, formerly known as
3 CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC (“Defendant”) (collectively the “Parties”), by and through their
4 attorneys of record in this case, hereby stipulate and request that the Court approve the filing of a
5 Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), and a briefing schedule for Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
6 the SAC, if any.
7
This stipulation and application for extension of time is based on the following facts:
8
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed this action on or about February 15, 2018;
9
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) in this action on or about
333 S SOUTH GRAND AVENUE
SUITE 2100
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP
10 February 16, 2018;
11
WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), the Parties stipulated to a twenty-eight (28) day
12 extension of Defendant’s time to respond to the FAC up to and including April 10, 2018;
13
WHEREAS, the Parties met and conferred on April 5, 2018 and April 6, 2018 regarding
14 Plaintiff’s CLRA claims contained in the FAC;
15
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that, subject to Court approval, there is good cause and
16 efficiencies may be achieved for the parties and the Court by filing a SAC that addresses issues
17 raised as part of the parties’ meet and confer efforts. The parties also stipulate, agree and request
18 the following deadline for answering the SAC in the event Defendant does not to file a Motion to
19 Dismiss Plaintiff’s SAC or, in the alternative, a briefing schedule in the event Defendant files a
20 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s SAC.
21
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate as follows:
22
1.
Plaintiff shall file its SAC no later than April 23, 2018.
23
2.
Defendant shall file its Answer or Motion to Dismiss in response to Plaintiff’s SAC
24
25
no later than May 14, 2018.
3.
26
27
28
If Defendant files a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s SAC, Plaintiff’s Opposition shall
be filed no later than June 4, 2018.
4.
Any Reply in support of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s SAC shall be
2
STIPULATION AND APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE FILING OF SAC AND SETTING A BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00360-MCE-EFB
1
2
3
4
5
filed no later than June 18, 2018.
5.
The hearing date for any Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s SAC filed by the Defendant
will be set for June 25, 2018.
Dated: April 9, 2018
6
DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP
James P. Feeney
Dommond E. Lonnie
Abirami Gnanadesigan
7
8
By: /s/ Dommond E. Lonnie
9
James P. Feeney
Dommond E. Lonnie
Abirami Gnanadesigan
Attorneys for Defendant
FCA US LLC f/k/a CHRYSLER GROUP
333 S SOUTH GRAND AVENUE
SUITE 2100
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP
10
11
12
13
14
15
Dated: April 9, 2018
KERSHAW, COOK & TALLEY PC
William A. Kershaw
Stuart C. Talley
Ian J. Barlow
16
17
By: /s/ Ian J. Barlow
18
(As authorized on April 9, 2018)
William A. Kershaw
Stuart C. Talley
Ian J. Barlow
Attorneys for PLAINTIFF AND THE
PUTATIVE CLASS
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE FILING OF SAC AND SETTING A BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00360-MCE-EFB
1
2
3
4
5
6
ORDER
The Court, having considered the Stipulation and Application for Extension of Time
submitted herewith, and good cause appearing, hereby enters the following order:
1.
Plaintiff shall file its SAC no later than April 23, 2018.
2.
Defendant shall file its Answer or Motion to Dismiss in response to Plaintiff’s SAC
7
8
no later than May 14, 2018.
3.
9
333 S SOUTH GRAND AVENUE
SUITE 2100
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP
10
be filed no later than June 4, 2018.
4.
11
12
13
14
15
16
If Defendant files a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s SAC, Plaintiff’s Opposition shall
Any Reply in support of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s SAC shall be
filed no later than June 18, 2018.
5.
The hearing date for any Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s SAC filed by the Defendant
will be set for June 25, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 10, 2018
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE FILING OF SAC AND SETTING A BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00360-MCE-EFB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?