Alger v. FCA US LLC
Filing
136
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/6/2020 EXTENDING Discovery to 3/30/2020. All other case deadlines shall be adjusted accordingly, consistent with the Court's Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order 3 . (Reader, L)
1
7
KERSHAW, COOK & TALLEY PC
William A. Kershaw (State Bar No. 057486)
Stuart C. Talley (State Bar No. 180374)
Ian J. Barlow (State Bar No. 262213)
401 Watt Avenue
Sacramento, California 95864
Telephone: (916) 779-7000
Facsimile: (916) 721-2501
Email: bill@kctlegal.com
Email: stalley@kctlegal.com
Email: ian@kctlegal.com
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff and the putative Class
9
DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP
James P. Feeney (State Bar No. 219045)
Fred J. Fresard (pro hac vice)
Dommond E. Lonnie (State Bar No. 142662)
Abirami Gnanadesigan (State Bar No. 263375)
333 South Grand Ave., Suite 2100
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: (213) 457-1800
Facsimile: (213) 457-1850
Email: jfeeney@dykema.com
Email: ffresard@dykema.com
Email: dlonnie@dykema.com
Email: agnanadesigan@dykema.com
2
3
4
5
6
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Attorneys for Defendant
FCA US LLC f/k/a Chrysler Group LLC
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
20
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
21
22
SHAWN ALGER as an individual and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
23
Case No.: 2:18-cv-00360-MCE-EFB
STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING DISCOVERY DEADLINES
Plaintiff,
24
v.
Assigned to Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.
Courtroom 7, 14th Floor
Complaint Filed: February 16, 2018
25
26
27
FCA US LLC f/k/a CHRYSLER GROUP
LLC, a Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1
through 100, inclusive,
Defendants.
28
1
STIP AND ORDER
2:18-cv-00360-MCE-EFB
1
Plaintiff Shawn Alger (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant FCA US LLC f/k/a Chrysler Group LLC
2
(“Defendant”) (together, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as
3
follows:
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
STIPULATION
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed his initial complaint on February 15, 2018 [Dkt. No. 1] and his
class action complaint on February 16, 2018 [Dkt. No. 4];
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed his Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) on April 23, 2018 [Dkt.
No. 13] and Defendant filed its Answer to the SAC on May 14, 2018 [Dkt. No. 14];
WHEREAS, Plaintiff served his initial disclosures on September 19, 2018 and Defendant
served its initial disclosures and supplemental initial disclosures on September 28, 2018;
WHEREAS, the Court entered an order on January 4, 2019 extending the discovery cut-off
to March 18, 2019 [Dkt. No. 43];
WHEREAS, Plaintiff has taken the deposition of Defendant’s Rule 30(b)(6) designees and
both Parties have taken several party and non-party depositions, as well as expert depositions;
15
WHEREAS, Plaintiff has served four sets of interrogatories and four sets of requests for
16
production of documents and Defendant has served two sets of interrogatories and three sets of
17
requests for production of documents;
18
19
20
21
22
23
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2019, the Court entered an order on stipulated class certification
deadlines and to extend the discovery cut-off to November 30, 2019 [Dkt. No. 47];
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation and the Court’s March 4, 2019 Order,
Plaintiff filed his motion for class certification on April 30, 2019;
WHEREAS, on June 12, 2019, the Court entered an order pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation
modifying class certification deadlines [Dkt. No. 65];
24
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation, Defendant filed its opposition to class
25
certification on July 15, 2019 and Plaintiff filed his reply in support of class certification on August
26
30, 2019;
27
WHEREAS, on September 20, 2019, the Court issued a Minute Order directing Plaintiff’s
28
counsel to submit “for the Court’s review, a comprehensive proposed order as to the Motion to
2
STIP AND ORDER
2:18-cv-00360-MCE-EFB
1
Certify Class [54] that is amenable to being filed on the public docket” [Dkt. No. 74];
2
WHEREAS, on September 20, 2019, Defendant filed a motion to exclude the opinions and
3
testimony of Plaintiff’s expert, Dr. Biondi [Dkt. No. 75] and a motion to strike the “Rebuttal Reports
4
of Plaintiff’s Expert Doctors” [Dkt. No. 78];
5
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s September 20, 2019 Order, Plaintiff submitted a
6
[Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification on September 24, 2019 [Dkt.
7
No. 81];
8
WHEREAS, Defendant filed objections to Plaintiff’s proposed order granting class
9
certification on October 1, 2019 [Dkt. No. 91] and filed a proposed order denying class certification
10
on October 2, 2019 [Dkt. No. 93], and Plaintiff filed a letter responding to Defendant’s objections
11
and proposed order on October 4, 2019 [Dkt. No. 95];
12
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s Minute Order directing that Defendant’s motion to strike
13
four of Plaintiff’s rebuttal expert reports be re-noticed before Magistrate Judge Brennan [Dkt. No.
14
86], Defendant re-filed and re-noticed its motion on October 1, 2019 [Dkt. No. 90];
15
WHEREAS, on October 22, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel Defendant to supplement
16
discovery responses pursuant to Rule 26(e), provide further responses to Plaintiff’s Fourth Set of
17
RFPs, and provide further responses to Plaintiff’s Fourth Set of Interrogatories, as well as to compel
18
compliance with depositions subpoenas served on four of Defendant’s dealerships [Dkt. Nos. 101
19
and 102];
20
WHEREAS, following the Parties’ extensive meet and confer efforts, Plaintiff offered to
21
make his rebuttal experts available for depositions. On October 25, 2019, Defendant served notices
22
of depositions of these experts on Plaintiff;
23
WHEREAS, on October 29, 2019, Judge England entered an order denying without prejudice
24
Defendant’s motion to exclude the opinions and testimony of Dr. Biondi, on the basis that the
25
motion was premature [Dkt. No. 106];
26
WHEREAS, on October 29, 2019, Judge Brennan issued a Minute Order [Dkt. No. 108]
27
directing the Parties to file a single joint statement addressing Defendant’s motion to strike [Dkt.
28
No. 90] and Plaintiff’s motions to compel [Dkt. Nos. 101 and 102];
3
STIP AND ORDER
2:18-cv-00360-MCE-EFB
1
2
3
4
WHEREAS, the Parties filed their Joint Statement Re Discovery Disagreement on November
6, 2019 [Dkt. No. 116];
WHEREAS, on the same day, Defendant filed a motion to stay [Dkt. No. 114], which has
been fully briefed by the Parties and is still pending [Dkt. Nos. 114, 126, and 129];
5
WHEREAS, on November 20, 2019, Judge Brennan entered an order denying Defendant’s
6
motion to strike four of Plaintiff’s rebuttal expert reports from Drs. Davis, Biondi, Ziejewski, and
7
Wachs and granting Plaintiff’s motion to compel [Dkt. No. 124]. Specifically, Judge Brennan
8
ordered Defendant to produce all documents responsive to Plaintiff’s RFP No. 29 by November 20,
9
2019. (Id.) Judge Brennan also ordered Defendant to produce all documents responsive to
10
Plaintiff’s RFP Nos. 10-14 and 33-36 and provide further responses to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories
11
Nos. 20-23 by November 27, 2019. (Id.) In addition, Judge Brennan ordered that Defendant shall
12
produce documents requested in each FCA dealership subpoena by 12:00 p.m. on the day before
13
each deposition. (Id.) Judge Brennan indicated during the hearing on Plaintiff’s motion to compel
14
that Defendant was to give its “best effort” to comply with the November 27, 2019 deadline, but
15
that the deadline would be revisited if Defendant presented a declaration describing its efforts to
16
comply with the deadline and stating that it could not meet the deadline in spite of due diligence
17
[Dkt. No. 128-1, p. 2];
18
WHEREAS, following the discovery hearing before Judge Brennan, the Parties engaged in a
19
series of telephonic and written meet and confer efforts in part to discuss Defendant’s supplemental
20
document productions, an ESI protocol for identifying relevant custodians and search terms,
21
documents submitted by Defendant to NHTSA in response to NHTSA’s September 9, 2019
22
Preliminary Evaluation (PE19-014), deposition dates for FCA dealerships, as well as deposition
23
dates for Plaintiff’s rebuttal experts;
24
25
WHEREAS, on November 27, 2019, Defendant filed a Motion to Extend Deadline to Produce
Certain Documents [Dkt. No. 128];
26
WHEREAS, as part of Defendant’s motion to extend the document production deadline,
27
Defendant represented that it already produced documents responsive to RPD No. 29, and that it
28
will have timely produced certain other discovery by the November 27, 2019 deadline, including
4
STIP AND ORDER
2:18-cv-00360-MCE-EFB
1
over 1,000 pages of documents responsive to RPD No. 13, supplemental responses to Interrogatories
2
Nos. 20-23, and all documents responsive to RPD Nos. 33-36. (FCA US LLC’s Mot. to Extend
3
Deadline to Produce Certain Docs., pp. 4-5.) [Dkt. No. 128-1]. Defendant also represented that its
4
application of initial search terms for a subset of just twelve custodians generated approximately
5
150,000 documents, that meet and confer efforts regarding custodians and an ESI protocol were
6
ongoing, that it was still in the process of compiling documents for its response to NHTSA, and that
7
despite its due diligence and good faith effort, it was unable to produce all documents responsive to
8
RPD Nos. 10-14 by the November 27, 2019 deadline. (Id., p. 5.; Dkt. No. 128-3, Declaration of
9
Brittany J. Mouzourakis.) Defendant requested that Judge Brennan “extend until December 10,
10
2019, its deadline for completing production of documents responsive to RPDs 10, 12, and 13, and
11
extend until January 30, 2020, its deadline for completing production of documents responsive to
12
RPDs 11 and 14.” [Dkt. No. 128-1, p. 6];
13
14
WHEREAS, following the filing of Defendant’s motion to extend the document production
deadline, the Parties continued to meet and confer on outstanding discovery issues;
15
WHEREAS, the Defendant produced documents responsive to RPDs 10, 12, and 13 on
16
December 6, 2019, and then represented to Plaintiff on December 10, 2019 that after a reasonable
17
and diligent search, Defendant had produced all documents discovered that were responsive to
18
RPDs 10, 12, and 13;
19
WHEREAS, Defendant represented to Plaintiff on December 12, 2019 that it would produce
20
the remaining documents ordered for production by Judge Brennan on a rolling basis, with the first
21
production on December 20, 2019, and an anticipated completion date of January 30, 2020;
22
23
WHEREAS, the Defendant produced documents on December 20, 2019, consistent with its
proposed rolling production schedule;
24
WHEREAS, the Parties have reached an agreement that Defendant will complete the
25
discovery requirements set forth in Judge Brennan’s November 20, 2019 Order by January 30, 2020
26
and Defendant will accordingly file a Notice of Agreement in Judge Brennan’s court;
27
WHEREAS, the Parties reached a further agreement to propose moving the discovery cut-off
28
to March 30, 2020, including for purposes of scheduling and conducting limited depositions of
5
STIP AND ORDER
2:18-cv-00360-MCE-EFB
1
Plaintiff’s rebuttal experts, scheduling and conducting remaining FCA dealership depositions, and
2
allowing Plaintiff seven (7) additional depositions, where any depositions of individuals previously
3
deposed would be limited to new documents or information contained in Defendant’s impending
4
December and January productions;
5
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that moving the discovery cut-off will address Defendant’s
6
motion to extend the document production deadline pending before Judge Brennan and that the
7
motion will be withdrawn upon the filing of this Stipulation; and
8
9
WHEREAS, good cause exists to extend the discovery cut-off by four months, to March 30,
2020, for the reasons described above and due to the intervening holidays.
10
NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned counsel for the Parties, having met and conferred,
11
stipulate and agree as follows:
12
///
13
///
14
///
15
///
16
///
17
///
18
///
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
6
STIP AND ORDER
2:18-cv-00360-MCE-EFB
1
1.
The deadline to complete merits-based discovery is extended to March 30, 2020. All
2
other case deadlines shall be adjusted accordingly, consistent with the Court’s Initial
3
Pretrial Scheduling Order [Dkt. No. 3].
4
Dated: January 2, 2020.
Respectfully submitted,
5
KERSHAW, COOK & TALLEY PC
6
7
By: /s/ Stuart C. Talley
STUART C. TALLEY
WILLIAM A. KERSHAW
IAN J. BARLOW
8
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff and the putative Class
10
11
Dated: January 2, 2020.
DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP
12
By: /s/ Fred J. Fresard
FRED J. FRESARD
DOMMOND E. LONNIE
JAMES P. FEENEY
ABIRAMI GNANADESIGAN
13
14
15
16
Attorneys for Defendant
FCA US LLC f/k/a/ Chrysler Group LLC
17
18
ORDER
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21
DATED: January 6, 2020
22
23
_______________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
24
25
26
27
28
7
STIP AND ORDER
2:18-cv-00360-MCE-EFB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?