Lipsey v. Norum et al
Filing
173
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/30/2018 DISREGARDNG plaintiff's 172 "Emergency Preliminary Injunction Request" filed on 11/29/2018, because plaintiff is represented by counsel in this case, the court cannot accept filings from him directly. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, Jr.,
12
No. 2:18-cv-0362 KJM DB P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
BARNES, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with an action under 42 U.S.C. §
18
1983. Plaintiff challenges the use of the Guard One security system at various prisons where he
19
has been incarcerated. On November 29, 2018, plaintiff, acting in pro per, filed a document
20
entitled “Emergency Preliminary Injunction Request.” (ECF No. 172.) Therein, plaintiff
21
complains about the prison’s deduction of court fees from his trust account.1
22
////
23
////
24
////
25
////
26
27
28
The court notes that plaintiff states he is incarcerated at Kern Valley State Prison (“KVSP”). If
he wishes to pursue an action against staff at KVSP, he must file that action in the Fresno
Division of this court.
1
1
1
2
3
4
Because plaintiff is represented by counsel in this case, the court cannot accept filings
from him directly. Accordingly, plaintiff’s November 29 filing will be disregarded.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 30, 2018
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
DLB:9
DB/prisoner-civil rights/lips0362.p csl
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?