Lipsey v. Norum et al

Filing 173

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/30/2018 DISREGARDNG plaintiff's 172 "Emergency Preliminary Injunction Request" filed on 11/29/2018, because plaintiff is represented by counsel in this case, the court cannot accept filings from him directly. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, Jr., 12 No. 2:18-cv-0362 KJM DB P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 BARNES, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with an action under 42 U.S.C. § 18 1983. Plaintiff challenges the use of the Guard One security system at various prisons where he 19 has been incarcerated. On November 29, 2018, plaintiff, acting in pro per, filed a document 20 entitled “Emergency Preliminary Injunction Request.” (ECF No. 172.) Therein, plaintiff 21 complains about the prison’s deduction of court fees from his trust account.1 22 //// 23 //// 24 //// 25 //// 26 27 28 The court notes that plaintiff states he is incarcerated at Kern Valley State Prison (“KVSP”). If he wishes to pursue an action against staff at KVSP, he must file that action in the Fresno Division of this court. 1 1 1 2 3 4 Because plaintiff is represented by counsel in this case, the court cannot accept filings from him directly. Accordingly, plaintiff’s November 29 filing will be disregarded. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 30, 2018 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 DLB:9 DB/prisoner-civil rights/lips0362.p csl 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?