Lipsey v. Norum et al
Filing
176
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 3/13/2019 ORDERING Defendants, within 30 days of the date of this order, to file a supplement to their motion to dismiss as described in this order and ORDERING Plaintiff to file a response within 30 days of the filing of Defendants' supplemental brief. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, Jr.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:18-cv-0362 KJM DB P
v.
ORDER
RON BARNES, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff
17
18
alleges defendants’ implementation and use of the Guard One security check system violated his
19
Eighth Amendment rights. On January 3, 2018, defendants filed a motion to dismiss this action.
20
Defendants allege, among other things, that they are entitled to qualified immunity because the
21
Guard One system was implemented pursuant to a court order issued in the Coleman v. Brown
22
class action.
On March 5, 2019, the district judge issued a ruling granting in part and denying in part
23
24
the defendants’ similar motion to dismiss in Rico v. Beard, 2:17-cv-1402 KJM DB P. This court
25
finds briefing on any effects of the Rico ruling on defendants’ present motion would be helpful.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
26
27
////
28
////
1
1
1.
Within thirty days of the date of this order, defendants shall file a supplement to their
2
motion to dismiss which addresses any effects on that motion of the district court’s
3
March 5, 2019 decision in Rico.
4
5
6
2. Within twenty days of the filing of defendants’ supplemental brief, plaintiff shall file a
response. Within ten days thereafter, defendants may file a reply.
Dated: March 13, 2019
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
DLB:9
DB/prisoner-civil rights/lips0362.mtd supp brfs
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?