Lipsey v. Norum et al

Filing 204

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/19/19 ORDERING to clarify the record and plaintiffs appointed counsels status, this court confirms the appointment of Kate Falkenstein and Shawna Ballard of Reichman Jorgensen LLP as counsel for plaintiff in this action. For purposes of proceedings in this court, the appointment of Ms. Falkenstein and Ms. Ballard is effective, nunc pro tunc, as of June 9, 2018, the date plaintiffs case was transferred here. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, Jr., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:18-cv-0362 KJM DB P v. ORDER Dr. NORUM, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff 17 18 initially filed this action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California 19 on June 16, 2014. On June 8, 2017, Judge Chhabria granted plaintiff’s motion for the 20 appointment of counsel and, a month later, appointed counsel for plaintiff. (ECF Nos. 137, 141.) 21 On June 9, 2018, Judge Chhabria transferred this case to the present court. (ECF No. 161.) 22 Plaintiff’s appointed counsel continued to represent plaintiff here. To clarify the record and plaintiff’s appointed counsel’s status, this court confirms the 23 24 appointment of Kate Falkenstein and Shawna Ballard of Reichman Jorgensen LLP as counsel for 25 plaintiff in this action. For purposes of proceedings in this court, the appointment of Ms. 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Falkenstein and Ms. Ballard is effective, nunc pro tunc, as of June 9, 2018, the date plaintiff’s 2 case was transferred here. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 19, 2019 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 DLB:9 DB/prisoner-civil rights/lips0362.appt csl 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?