Lipsey v. Norum et al
Filing
204
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/19/19 ORDERING to clarify the record and plaintiffs appointed counsels status, this court confirms the appointment of Kate Falkenstein and Shawna Ballard of Reichman Jorgensen LLP as counsel for plaintiff in this action. For purposes of proceedings in this court, the appointment of Ms. Falkenstein and Ms. Ballard is effective, nunc pro tunc, as of June 9, 2018, the date plaintiffs case was transferred here. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, Jr.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:18-cv-0362 KJM DB P
v.
ORDER
Dr. NORUM, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff
17
18
initially filed this action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California
19
on June 16, 2014. On June 8, 2017, Judge Chhabria granted plaintiff’s motion for the
20
appointment of counsel and, a month later, appointed counsel for plaintiff. (ECF Nos. 137, 141.)
21
On June 9, 2018, Judge Chhabria transferred this case to the present court. (ECF No. 161.)
22
Plaintiff’s appointed counsel continued to represent plaintiff here.
To clarify the record and plaintiff’s appointed counsel’s status, this court confirms the
23
24
appointment of Kate Falkenstein and Shawna Ballard of Reichman Jorgensen LLP as counsel for
25
plaintiff in this action. For purposes of proceedings in this court, the appointment of Ms.
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
Falkenstein and Ms. Ballard is effective, nunc pro tunc, as of June 9, 2018, the date plaintiff’s
2
case was transferred here.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 19, 2019
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
DLB:9
DB/prisoner-civil rights/lips0362.appt csl
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?