Brooks v. Lee et al

Filing 25

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/25/2019 ADOPTING 21 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Arnold without prejudice. (Huang, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RODNEY BROOKS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:18-cv-0374-WBS-EFB P

v.

ORDER

S. LEE, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On April 29, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

21

were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings

22

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to

23

the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

24
25

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

26

ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed April 29, 2019, are adopted in full; and

27
28

/////
1

1
2

2. Plaintiff’s claims against defendant Arnold are dismissed without prejudice.
Dated: June 25, 2019

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2