Caloca v. Equifax, Inc.

Filing 8

SECOND STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/10/2018 EXTENDING Time 30 days from the date that Plaintiff files his first amended complaint for Equifax, Inc. to File its Response. (York, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 THOMAS P. QUINN, JR. (SBN 132268) NOKES & QUINN 410 Broadway, Suite 200 Laguna Beach, CA 92651 Tel: (949) 376-3500 Fax: (949) 376-3070 Email: tquinn@nokesquinn.com Attorney for Defendant EQUIFAX INC. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 10 11 ROBERTO CALOCA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) vs. EQUIFAX INC., 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff ROBERTO CALOCA Case No.: 2:18-cv-00382-MCE-EFB SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Complaint Served: 02/21/2018 Original Response Date: 03/14/2018 Current Response Date: 04/13/2018 New Response Date: 30 Days from Filing of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant EQUIFAX INC. (“Defendant”), hereby stipulate as follows: 1. Plaintiff served Defendant on February 21, 2018. 2. Defendant’s initial deadline to respond to the Complaint was March 14, 2018. 3. Plaintiff and Defendant initially agreed to extend the time 30 days for Defendant to respond to the Complaint up to and including April 13, 2018, so that Defendant would have additional time to investigate this matter and the parties could explore the possibility of settlement. Accordingly, on March 3, 2018, Equifax filed a stipulation between Plaintiff and Equifax to extend time to respond to the Complaint up to and including April 13, 2018 (docket #6). -1– NOKES & QUINN 410 Broadway, Suite 200 Laguna Beach, CA 92651 (949) 376-3500 ___________________________________________________________________ SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 1 4. On or about April 5, 2018, Plaintiff informed Defendant that he intended to file a 2 First Amended Complaint. Accordingly, Plaintiff and Defendant agreed that Defendant’s deadline 3 to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint should be further extended to 30 days from 4 the filing date of the First Amended Complaint, and therefore submit this second stipulation to 5 extend time to the Complaint. 6 7 8 This change in response deadline will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order, local rules, or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Respectfully submitted April 10, 2018: 9 NOKES & QUINN 10 /s/ Thomas P. Quinn, Jr. THOMAS P. QUINN, JR. (Bar No. 132268) NOKES & QUINN 410 Broadway, Suite 200 Laguna Beach, CA 92651 Tel: (949) 376-3500 Fax: (949) 376-3070 Email: tquinn@nokesquinn.com Attorney for Defendant Equifax Inc. 11 12 13 14 15 16 /s/ Elliot W. Gale ELLIOT W. GALE (Bar No. 263326) SAGARIA LAW, P.C. 3017 Douglas Blvd, Suite 200 Roseville, CA 95661 Tel: (408) 279-2288 Fax: (408) 279-2299 Email: egale@sagarialaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff 17 18 19 20 21 22 Signature Attestation 23 24 I obtained the approval of Elliot W. Gail to affix his signature to this stipulation and the 25 authorization of Elliot W. Gail to submit this stipulation on his behalf. 26 April 10, 2018 27 /s/ Thomas P. Quinn, Jr. THOMAS P. QUINN, JR. 28 -2– NOKES & QUINN 410 Broadway, Suite 200 Laguna Beach, CA 92651 (949) 376-3500 ___________________________________________________________________ SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 1 2 3 4 5 ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, Equifax is granted a further extension to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint until 30 days from the date that Plaintiff files his first amended complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 10, 2018 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3– NOKES & QUINN 410 Broadway, Suite 200 Laguna Beach, CA 92651 (949) 376-3500 ___________________________________________________________________ SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?