Yardstash Solutions, LLC v. Marketfleet, Inc.

Filing 56

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/16/18, ORDERING that the hearings on the Motions (ECF No. 52 , 53 , 54 ) are CONTINUED to 5/3/2018 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Matthew J. Faust, State Bar No. 254145 faust@shariffaust.com Khodadad D. Sharif, State Bar No. 187992 sharif@shariffaust.com SHARIF | FAUST LAWYERS, LTD. 110 West A Street, Suite 1100 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 233-6600 Facsimile: (619) 233-6602 Attorneys for Plaintiff YardStash Solutions, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ) ) YARDSTASH SOLUTIONS, LLC ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) ) MARKETFLEET, INC., and DOES 1 ) THROUGH 25, inclusive, ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) 19 22 23 2:18-CV-00385-TLN-AC STIPULATION AND ORDER THEREON TO CONTINUE 19 APRIL 2018 HEARING DATES TO 3 MAY 2018 Dist. Judge: Hon. Troy L. Nunley Courtroom: 2 STIPULATION 20 21 Case No.: WHEREAS, Defendant MARKETFLEET, INC. (hereinafter “Defendant”) filed the following motions in this Court, all with a hearing date set for 19 April 2018: 24 25 26 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ YardStash Solutions, LLC v. Marketfleet, Inc. Stipulation and Proposed Order Thereon to Continue 19 April 2018 Hearing Dates to 3 May 2018 1 1 1. Motion to Stay Proceedings [Doc. 53]; 2 2. Motion for Sanctions [Doc. No. 52]; and 3 3. Motion to Extend [Doc. No. 54], (collectively, hereinafter the 4 “Motions”). 5 WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff YARDSTASH SOLUTIONS, LLC 6 7 (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) is engaged in trial in San Diego, commencing on the 13 th 8 of April, and continuing through the following week (16 April – 20 April) in the 9 case entitled R2 Mpowered, LLC v. South Bay Investment Group, Inc.; 10 11 12 13 WHEREAS, the counsel for Plaintiff is engaged in trial in San Diego, commencing on the 11th of May, and continuing through the following week (14 May – 18 May) in the case entitled Judy Daggett v. Valerie Jauregui; 14 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and 15 between Plaintiff and Defendant, through their undersigned Counsel, as a result of 16 the foregoing, that good cause exists to continue the hearings on the Motions from 17 18 19 the 19th of April until the 3rd of May. By virtue of this stipulation neither party waives the claims or positions to be asserted in litigating the Motions. The Parties hereby respectfully move the Court to continue the hearings on 20 21 the Motions from the 19th of April until the 3rd of May. 22 /// 23 /// 24 25 26 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ YardStash Solutions, LLC v. Marketfleet, Inc. Stipulation and Proposed Order Thereon to Continue 19 April 2018 Hearing Dates to 3 May 2018 2 1 /// 2 Respectfully submitted, 3 4 5 SHARIF | FAUST LAWYERS, LTD. Dated: 14 March 2018 By: /s/ Matthew J. Faust MATTHEW J. FAUST Attorneys for Plaintiff YardStash Solutions, LLC 6 7 8 9 10 FRIEDLAND ENTERPRISES, LLC Dated: 14 March 2018 By: 11 /s/ Ignacio Bellver Ignacio Bellver Attorneys for Defendant Marketfleet, Inc. 12 ORDER 13 14 After reviewing the Parties’ Stipulation, the Court finds that good cause 15 exists to continue the hearings on the Motions from the 19th of April until the 3rd of 16 May; accordingly, 17 18 19 20 IT IS ORDERED that the hearings on the Motions shall be continued until May 3, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. Dated: March 16, 2018 21 22 23 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 24 25 26 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ YardStash Solutions, LLC v. Marketfleet, Inc. Stipulation and Proposed Order Thereon to Continue 19 April 2018 Hearing Dates to 3 May 2018 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?