Yardstash Solutions, LLC v. Marketfleet, Inc.
Filing
56
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/16/18, ORDERING that the hearings on the Motions (ECF No. 52 , 53 , 54 ) are CONTINUED to 5/3/2018 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Matthew J. Faust, State Bar No. 254145
faust@shariffaust.com
Khodadad D. Sharif, State Bar No. 187992
sharif@shariffaust.com
SHARIF | FAUST LAWYERS, LTD.
110 West A Street, Suite 1100
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: (619) 233-6600
Facsimile: (619) 233-6602
Attorneys for Plaintiff
YardStash Solutions, LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
)
)
YARDSTASH SOLUTIONS, LLC
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
)
MARKETFLEET, INC., and DOES 1 )
THROUGH 25, inclusive,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
19
22
23
2:18-CV-00385-TLN-AC
STIPULATION
AND
ORDER
THEREON TO CONTINUE 19 APRIL
2018 HEARING DATES TO 3 MAY
2018
Dist. Judge: Hon. Troy L. Nunley
Courtroom: 2
STIPULATION
20
21
Case No.:
WHEREAS, Defendant MARKETFLEET, INC. (hereinafter “Defendant”)
filed the following motions in this Court, all with a hearing date set for 19 April
2018:
24
25
26
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
YardStash Solutions, LLC v. Marketfleet, Inc.
Stipulation and Proposed Order Thereon to Continue 19 April 2018 Hearing Dates to 3 May 2018
1
1
1. Motion to Stay Proceedings [Doc. 53];
2
2. Motion for Sanctions [Doc. No. 52]; and
3
3. Motion to Extend [Doc. No. 54], (collectively, hereinafter the
4
“Motions”).
5
WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff YARDSTASH SOLUTIONS, LLC
6
7
(hereinafter “Plaintiff”) is engaged in trial in San Diego, commencing on the 13 th
8
of April, and continuing through the following week (16 April – 20 April) in the
9
case entitled R2 Mpowered, LLC v. South Bay Investment Group, Inc.;
10
11
12
13
WHEREAS, the counsel for Plaintiff is engaged in trial in San Diego,
commencing on the 11th of May, and continuing through the following week (14
May – 18 May) in the case entitled Judy Daggett v. Valerie Jauregui;
14
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and
15
between Plaintiff and Defendant, through their undersigned Counsel, as a result of
16
the foregoing, that good cause exists to continue the hearings on the Motions from
17
18
19
the 19th of April until the 3rd of May. By virtue of this stipulation neither party
waives the claims or positions to be asserted in litigating the Motions.
The Parties hereby respectfully move the Court to continue the hearings on
20
21
the Motions from the 19th of April until the 3rd of May.
22
///
23
///
24
25
26
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
YardStash Solutions, LLC v. Marketfleet, Inc.
Stipulation and Proposed Order Thereon to Continue 19 April 2018 Hearing Dates to 3 May 2018
2
1
///
2
Respectfully submitted,
3
4
5
SHARIF | FAUST LAWYERS, LTD.
Dated: 14 March 2018
By:
/s/ Matthew J. Faust
MATTHEW J. FAUST
Attorneys for Plaintiff
YardStash Solutions, LLC
6
7
8
9
10
FRIEDLAND ENTERPRISES, LLC
Dated: 14 March 2018
By:
11
/s/ Ignacio Bellver
Ignacio Bellver
Attorneys for Defendant
Marketfleet, Inc.
12
ORDER
13
14
After reviewing the Parties’ Stipulation, the Court finds that good cause
15
exists to continue the hearings on the Motions from the 19th of April until the 3rd of
16
May; accordingly,
17
18
19
20
IT IS ORDERED that the hearings on the Motions shall be continued until
May 3, 2018 at 2:00 p.m.
Dated: March 16, 2018
21
22
23
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
24
25
26
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
YardStash Solutions, LLC v. Marketfleet, Inc.
Stipulation and Proposed Order Thereon to Continue 19 April 2018 Hearing Dates to 3 May 2018
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?