Singh et al v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC

Filing 41

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/9/19 GRANTING 40 Stipulation and Proposed Order to replace Exhibit A of 37 Stipulation with a redacted death certificate. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 Edward Misleh SBN 273645 The Law Offices of Edward Misleh APC 615 Tenth Street Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 443-1267 ed@edwardmisleh.com 4 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff: Paul Singh and Andrea Singh 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 PAUL SINGH AND ANDREA SINGH, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 Case No.: 2:18-cv-00445-WBS-AC v. ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION FOR ORDER TO REPLACE EXHIBIT “A” WITH A REDACTED DEATH CERTIFICATE FILED WITH THE JOINT STIPULATION FOR ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF ANDREA SINGH AS SUCCESSOR TO PAUL SINGH LOWE’S HOME CENTERS, LLC, and DOES 1 to 50, Inclusive, 14 Defendant 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER The Court, having read and considered the Joint Stipulation for Order granting replacement of Exhibit A with a redacted death certificate in place of the un-redacted death certificate that was filed with the Joint Stipulation for Order Granting Substitution of Andrea Singh as successor to Paul Singh, 23 24 25 and good cause appearing therefore, rules as follows: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT replacement of Exhibit A with a redacted death certificate in 26 place of the un-redacted death certificate that was filed with the Joint Stipulation for Order Granting 27 Substitution of Andrea Singh as successor to Paul Singh, is granted. 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION FOR ORDER TO REPLACE EXHIBIT “A” WITH A REDACTED DEATH CERTIFICATE 1 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 Dated: October 9, 2019 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION FOR ORDER TO REPLACE EXHIBIT “A” WITH A REDACTED DEATH CERTIFICATE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?