Smith et al v. Westwood Vistas et al
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/17/2018 DENYING 3 Motion to Proceed IFP without prejudice to its renewal by each plaintiff individually, and with all entries on each form completed. Plaintiffs are GRANTED 30 days to renew the IFP application in proper form, or pay the filing fee. (Fabillaran, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PATRICIA LYNN SMITH, et al.,
12
13
No. 2:18-cv-0473 JAM AC
Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER
14
WESTWOOD VISTAS, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiffs are proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was accordingly referred to the
18
undersigned by E.D. Cal. 302(c)(21). Plaintiffs have requested leave to proceed in forma
19
pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF No. 3.
20
The court cannot accept plaintiffs’ IFP application in its current form. To file a complaint
21
in federal district court, plaintiff must either pay the filing fee or file an IFP application. Here,
22
only one plaintiff has filled out an IFP application. In cases such as this with multiple plaintiffs,
23
each individual plaintiff is required to file a separate IFP application containing her individual
24
financial information. This is necessary in order for the court to determine whether granting IFP
25
status for each plaintiff is appropriate.
26
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
1. Plaintiffs’ request to proceed IFP (ECF No. 3) is DENIED without prejudice to its
28
renewal by each plaintiff individually, and with all entries on each form completed.
1
1
2. Plaintiffs are granted 30 days from the date of this order to renew the IFP application in
2
proper form, or to pay the filing fee. Plaintiffs are cautioned that failure to timely renew the IFP
3
in proper form, or to pay the filing fee, may result in a recommendation that this action be
4
dismissed.
5
DATED: April 17, 2018
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?