Dev v. Deo et al

Filing 23

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/7/2019 GRANTING 22 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff shall have until 2/4/2019 to file objections to 21 Findings and Recommendations. (Huang, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

AJAY KUMAR DEV,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:18-cv-00480 TLN AC PS

v.

ORDER

BIRENDA NARAYAN DEO, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff is proceeding in this case in pro per. The proceeding has accordingly been

17
18

referred to the magistrate judge by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21).

19

Plaintiff has requested a 30-day extension of time to file his objections to the

20

undersigned’s findings and recommendations. ECF No. 22. Plaintiff indicates he is having

21

difficulties accessing the prison law library, which is currently open only two days each week and

22

serves approximately 700 inmates. Id. Plaintiff is informed that his objections need only identify

23

the matters to which he objects, and bases for the objections; legal argument and detailed briefing

24

are not required. Nonetheless, considering the plaintiff’s pro se status and the procedural posture

25

of this case, the extension will be granted. Further requests for extension on the same grounds

26

will be looked upon with disfavor.

27

////

28

////

1

For cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of

2

time (ECF No. 22) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have until Monday, February 4, 2019 to file

3

objections to the undersigned’s findings and recommendations.

4

DATED: January 7, 2019

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2