Asmus et al v. Arjohuntleigh, Inc.

Filing 14

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/10/2018 DISMISSING Case with Prejudice. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement entered into between the parties. CASE CLOSED. (York, M)

1 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
NORA M. NACHTSHEIM, SB# 221618
2 2020 West El Camino Avenue, Suite 700
Sacramento, California 95833
3 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 916.564.5444
4
5 Attorneys for Defendant ARJO, INC,. fka
Arjohuntleigh, Inc.
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION

10
11 JODI ASMUS, et al.,

CASE NO. 2:18-cv-00488-MCE-DB

12

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:
DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE

Plaintiffs,

13

vs.

14 ARJOHUNTLEIGH, INC.,

[Assigned to Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.]

15

Trial Date:

Defendants.

None Set

16
17

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties to this action,

18 by their respective attorneys, its form and content being hereby approved, that the above-captioned
19 action is dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule
20 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
21

The parties have entered into a Settlement Agreement, and have agreed to bear their own

22 attorneys’ fees and costs. The parties to this action request this Court to retain jurisdiction to
23 enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement.
24 / / /
25 / / /
26 / / /
27 / / /

LEWI
S

BRISBOI
S
BISGAAR
D

28
4818-7913-9186.1

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

1 DATED: September, 7, 2018

ARNOLD LAW FIRM

2
3

By:

4
5
6 DATED: September 10, 2018

/s/ Joshua H. Watson
Joshua H. Watson
Attorneys for Plaintiffs JODI ASMUS, et al.

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH

LLP

7
8

By:

9
10
11

/s/ Nora M. Nachtsheim
Nora M. Nachtsheim
Attorneys for Defendant ARJO, INC. fka
Arjohuntleigh, Inc.

ORDER

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Based upon the foregoing Stipulation, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR,
IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. The above-captioned action is hereby dismissed, with prejudice.
2. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement
entered into between the parties.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 10, 2018

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

LEWI
S

BRISBOI
S
BISGAAR
D

28
4818-7913-9186.1

2

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

1

FEDERAL COURT PROOF OF SERVICE

2

Asmus, et al v Arjohuntleigh, Inc. - Case No. 2:18-cv-00488-MCE-DB

3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
4

At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to the action. My
business address is 2020 West El Camino Avenue, Suite 700, Sacramento, CA 95833. I am
5 employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was
made.
6
On September 11, 2018, I served the following document(s): STIPULATION AND
7 ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
8
9

I served the documents on the following persons at the following addresses (including fax
numbers and e-mail addresses, if applicable):
The documents were served by the following means:

10

Joshua H. Watson
The Arnold Law Firm
865 Howe Avenue
Sacramento, CA 95825
Email: [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail]

11
12
13
14
15
16
17

¨

(BY U.S. MAIL) I enclosed the documents in a sealed envelope or package addressed to
the persons at the addresses listed above and I deposited the sealed envelope or package
with the U.S. Postal Service, with the postage fully prepaid.

ý

(BY COURT’S CM/ECF SYSTEM) Pursuant to Local Rule, I electronically filed the
documents with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which sent notification
of that filing to the persons listed above.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America and the
18 State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
19

Executed on September 11, 2018, at Sacramento, California.

20
21

/s/ Starna Erickson
Starna Erickson

22
23
24
25
26
27

LEWI
S

BRISBOI
S
BISGAAR
D

28
4818-7913-9186.1

3

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE