United States of America v. State of California et al

Filing 41

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/29/2018 ORDERING: Defendants' Opposition Brief due by 5/4/2018; Amici Curiae Briefs due by 5/18/2018; Plaintiff's Reply Brief due by 6/8/2018; and the hearing on 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction hearing set for 6/20/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Donati, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 16 THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 17 Defendants. No. 2:18-cv-490-JAM-KJN ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR FILING OF DEFENDANTS’ BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, AMICI CURIAE BRIEFS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; AND PLAINTIFF’S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 18 ORDER RE: HEARING DATE FOR MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 19 20 21 22 The Court, having denied Defendants’ Motion to Transfer, 23 sets the following dates for (1) the filing of the parties’ 24 remaining briefs in opposition to or in support of Plaintiff’s 25 motion for a preliminary injunction; (2) the filing of amici 26 curiae briefs in support of Defendants’ opposition to the motion 27 for preliminary injunction; and (3) the hearing on the motion for 28 preliminary injunction. 1 1 Last Day to File 2 Defendants’ Opposition Brief May 4, 2018 3 Amici Curiae Briefs in Support of Defendants’ Opposition May 18, 2018 5 Plaintiff’s Reply Brief June 8, 2018 6 Hearing on Motion for Preliminary Injunction June 20, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. 4 7 8 9 The parties are cautioned against filing lengthy objections to evidence. The Court engages in self-policing and does not 10 reach decisions based on evidence that is irrelevant, 11 speculative, or conclusory. 12 Cal., 433 F. Supp. 2d 1110, 1118–1122 (E.D. Cal. 2006) 13 (discussing problems with parties raising numerous evidentiary 14 objections on a summary judgment motion). 15 in the opposing party’s evidence should be addressed through 16 arguments in the briefs, not through evidentiary objections. 17 at 1119 (“Instead of objecting, parties should simply argue that 18 the facts are not material.”). 19 20 See Burch v. Regents of Univ. of IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 29, 2018 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 A perceived weakness Id.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?