United States of America v. State of California et al

Filing 71

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/30/18: No hearing date and no dates for the filing of the opposition and reply briefs for Defendants' anticipated Motion to Dismiss will be set at this time. The Motion to Dismiss will not, under any circumstances, be heard before June 20, 2018. The requests to enlarge the Court's page limits for the Motion to Dismiss are denied. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

12
13
14

No.

2:18-cv-00490 JAM-KJN

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

The Court has received, read and considered the Joint Status

18

Report (ECF No. 67) filed by the parties on April 27, 2018 and

19

responds as follows:

20

1.

No hearing date and no dates for the filing of the

21

opposition and reply briefs for Defendants’ anticipated Motion to

22

Dismiss will be set at this time.

23

Motion to Dismiss to determine whether it will be more efficient

24

to hear this Motion on June 20, 2018 or on a different date.

25

Motion to Dismiss will not, under any circumstances, be heard

26

before June 20, 2018.

27
28

2.

The Court needs to review the

The

The requests to enlarge the Court’s page limits for the

Motion to Dismiss are denied.

If there is overlap between the
1

1

Motion for Preliminary Injunction and the Motion to Dismiss the

2

parties can incorporate by reference arguments made in their

3

briefs rather than repeat the same argument in separate briefs.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 30, 2018

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2