United States of America v. State of California et al
Filing
71
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/30/18: No hearing date and no dates for the filing of the opposition and reply briefs for Defendants' anticipated Motion to Dismiss will be set at this time. The Motion to Dismiss will not, under any circumstances, be heard before June 20, 2018. The requests to enlarge the Court's page limits for the Motion to Dismiss are denied. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
12
13
14
No.
2:18-cv-00490 JAM-KJN
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
The Court has received, read and considered the Joint Status
18
Report (ECF No. 67) filed by the parties on April 27, 2018 and
19
responds as follows:
20
1.
No hearing date and no dates for the filing of the
21
opposition and reply briefs for Defendants’ anticipated Motion to
22
Dismiss will be set at this time.
23
Motion to Dismiss to determine whether it will be more efficient
24
to hear this Motion on June 20, 2018 or on a different date.
25
Motion to Dismiss will not, under any circumstances, be heard
26
before June 20, 2018.
27
28
2.
The Court needs to review the
The
The requests to enlarge the Court’s page limits for the
Motion to Dismiss are denied.
If there is overlap between the
1
1
Motion for Preliminary Injunction and the Motion to Dismiss the
2
parties can incorporate by reference arguments made in their
3
briefs rather than repeat the same argument in separate briefs.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 30, 2018
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?