Thurston v. Younger

Filing 80

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/15/2022 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2). With the consent of the Parties, the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing the terms of the Parties' settlement agreement. Except as provided in Paragraph 1, the case is DISMISSED. Each party shall bear their own costs and fees. CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANDERSON THURSTON,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.

No. 2:18-cv-00527-TLN-CKD

ORDER

R. YOUNGER, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Anderson Thurston and Defendant R.

17
18

Younger’s (collectively, the “Parties”) Joint Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2). (ECF

19

No. 77.) The Parties agree that the action has been settled and that the settlement reached fully

20

resolves the claims in Plaintiff’s Complaint. Accordingly, the Parties request in the instant

21

motion that the action be dismissed with prejudice and that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce

22

the terms of their settlement agreement. For the reasons stated in the Parties’ motion, the Court

23

finds that the proposed dismissal is proper under Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil

24

Procedure.

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. With the consent of the Parties, the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the purposes of

3

enforcing the terms of the Parties’ settlement agreement;

4

2. Except as provided in Paragraph 1, the case is DISMISSED with prejudice; and

5

3. Each party shall bear their own costs and fees.

6

DATED: August 15, 2022

7
8
9
10

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2