Guina v. River Pines Public Utility District et al
Filing
15
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/18/18, ORDERING that initial disclosures shall be completed by 6/22/2018, and all discovery shall be completed by 7/1/2019. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 7/15/2019 with any rebuttal expert disclosures due by 8/29/2019. All expert discovery shall be completed by 10/13/2019. All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than 12/4/2019. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GREG GUINA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:18-cv-00530-KJM-GGH
v.
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)
RIVER PINES PUBLIC UTILITY
DISTRICT; et al.,
ORDER
Defendants
16
17
18
An initial scheduling conference was held in this case on June 7, 2019. John
19
20
Crowley appeared for plaintiff; Michael Christian appeared for defendants.
21
Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Status Report filed on May 31, 2018, and
22
discussed a schedule for the case with counsel at the hearing, the court makes the following
23
orders:
24
I.
SERVICE OF PROCESS
All named defendants have been served and no further service is permitted without
25
26
leave of court, good cause having been shown.
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
II.
2
ADDITIONAL PARTIES/AMENDMENTS/PLEADINGS
No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted without
3
leave of court, good cause having been shown. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b); Johnson v. Mammoth
4
Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992).
5
III.
6
JURISDICTION/VENUE
Jurisdiction is predicated upon 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988 and supplemental
7
jurisdiction upon 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). Jurisdiction and venue are not disputed.
8
IV.
9
DISCOVERY
Initial disclosures as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) shall be
10
completed by June 22, 2018. No other discovery shall be conducted until after initial disclosures
11
are completed. All discovery shall be completed by July 1, 2019. In this context, “completed”
12
means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all depositions have been taken and
13
any disputes relative to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if necessary and,
14
where discovery has been ordered, the order has been obeyed. All motions to compel discovery
15
must be noticed on the magistrate judge’s calendar in accordance with the local rules of this court.
16
While the assigned magistrate judge reviews proposed discovery phase protective orders, requests
17
to seal or redact are decided by Judge Mueller as discussed in more detail below. In addition,
18
while the assigned magistrate judge handles discovery motions, the magistrate judge cannot
19
change the schedule set in this order, except that the magistrate judge may modify a discovery
20
cutoff to the extent such modification does not have the effect of requiring a change to the
21
balance of the schedule.
22
V.
23
DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES
All counsel are to designate in writing and serve upon all other parties the name,
24
address, and area of expertise of each expert that they propose to tender at trial not later than
25
July 15, 2019. The designation shall be accompanied by a written report prepared and signed by
26
the witness. The report shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B). By August 29, 2019, any
27
party who previously disclosed expert witnesses may submit a rebuttal list of expert witnesses
28
who will express an opinion on a subject covered by an expert designated by an adverse party, if
2
1
the party rebutting an expert witness designation has not previously retained an expert to testify
2
on that subject. The rebuttal designation shall be accompanied by a written report, which shall
3
also comply with the conditions stated above.
4
Failure of a party to comply with the disclosure schedule as set forth above in all
5
likelihood will preclude that party from calling the expert witness at the time of trial. An expert
6
witness not appearing on the designation will not be permitted to testify unless the party offering
7
the witness demonstrates: (a) that the necessity for the witness could not have been reasonably
8
anticipated at the time the list was proffered; (b) that the court and opposing counsel were
9
promptly notified upon discovery of the witness; and (c) that the witness was promptly made
10
available for deposition.
11
For purposes of this scheduling order, an “expert” is any person who may be used
12
at trial to present evidence under Rules 702, 703 and 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which
13
include both “percipient experts” (persons who, because of their expertise, have rendered expert
14
opinions in the normal course of their work duties or observations pertinent to the issues in the
15
case) and “retained experts” (persons specifically designated by a party to be a testifying expert
16
for the purposes of litigation). A party shall identify whether a disclosed expert is percipient,
17
retained, or both. It will be assumed that a party designating a retained expert has acquired the
18
express permission of the witness to be so listed. Parties designating percipient experts must state
19
in the designation who is responsible for arranging the deposition of such persons.
20
All experts designated are to be fully prepared at the time of designation to render
21
an informed opinion, and give the bases for their opinion, so that they will be able to give full and
22
complete testimony at any deposition taken by the opposing party. Experts will not be permitted
23
to testify at trial as to any information gathered or evaluated, or opinion formed, after deposition
24
taken subsequent to designation. All expert discovery shall be completed by October 13, 2019.
25
/////
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
3
1
VI.
MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE
2
All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining
3
orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than December 4, 2019.1 The
4
parties may obtain available hearing dates by checking Judge Mueller’s page on the court’s
5
website.
6
7
All purely legal issues are to be resolved by timely pretrial motions. Local Rule
230 governs the calendaring and procedures of civil motions; the following provisions also apply:
8
(a)
The opposition and reply must be filed by 4:00 p.m. on the day due; and
9
(b)
When the last day for filing an opposition brief falls on a legal holiday, the
10
opposition brief shall be filed on the last court day immediately preceding the legal holiday.
11
Failure to comply with Local Rule 230(c), as modified by this order, may be deemed consent to
12
the motion and the court may dispose of the motion summarily. Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651,
13
652-53 (9th Cir. 1994).
14
The court values the importance of training young attorneys. The parties are
15
encouraged to consider assigning oral argument to a young attorney. If a written request for oral
16
argument is filed before a hearing, stating an attorney of four or fewer years out of law school
17
will argue the oral argument, then the court will ordinarily hold the hearing, although the court’s
18
schedule and calendar may require the hearing to be reset. Otherwise, the court may find it
19
appropriate in some actions to submit a motion without oral argument.
20
The court places a page limit of twenty (20) pages on all moving papers, twenty
21
(20) pages on oppositions, and ten (10) pages for replies. All requests for page limit increases
22
must be made in writing at least fourteen (14) days prior to the filing of the motion.
23
Prior to filing a motion in a case in which the parties are represented by counsel,
24
counsel shall engage in a pre-filing meet and confer to discuss thoroughly the substance of the
25
contemplated motion and any potential resolution. Plaintiff’s counsel should carefully evaluate
26
the defendant’s contentions as to deficiencies in the complaint and in many instances the party
27
28
1
Note that this date may not correspond to a law and motion calendar date.
4
1
considering a motion should agree to any amendment that would cure a curable defect. Counsel
2
should discuss the issues sufficiently so that if a motion of any kind is filed, including for
3
summary judgment, the briefing is directed only to those substantive issues requiring resolution
4
by the court. Counsel should resolve minor procedural or other non-substantive matters during
5
the meet and confer. A notice of motion shall contain a certification by counsel filing the
6
motion that meet and confer efforts have been exhausted, with a brief summary of meet and
7
confer efforts.
8
9
The parties are cautioned that failure to raise a dispositive legal issue that could
have been tendered to the court by proper pretrial motion prior to the dispositive motion cut-off
10
date may constitute waiver of such issue.
11
VII.
12
SEALING
No document will be sealed, nor shall a redacted document be filed, without the
13
prior approval of the court. If a document for which sealing or redaction is sought relates to the
14
record on a motion to be decided by Judge Mueller, the request to seal or redact should be
15
directed to her and not the assigned Magistrate Judge. All requests to seal or redact shall be
16
governed by Local Rules 141 (sealing) and 140 (redaction); protective orders covering the
17
discovery phase of litigation shall not govern the filing of sealed or redacted documents on the
18
public docket. The court will only consider requests to seal or redact filed by the proponent of
19
sealing or redaction. If a party plans to make a filing that includes material an opposing party has
20
identified as confidential and potentially subject to sealing, the filing party shall provide the
21
opposing party with sufficient notice in advance of filing to allow for the seeking of an order of
22
sealing or redaction from the court.
23
VIII.
24
FURTHER SCHEDULING
The court will set a Final Pretrial Conference date after the resolution of any
25
dispositive motions, or passage of the dispositive motion cutoff, with a trial date being
26
determined at the pretrial conference. The parties should be prepared to confirm a trial date
27
within 60 to 120 days from the date of the final pretrial conference, and should be available for
28
trial accordingly.
5
1
IX.
2
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
No settlement conference is currently scheduled. A settlement conference may be
3
set at the time of the Final Pretrial Conference or at an earlier time at the parties’ request. In the
4
event that an earlier court settlement conference date or referral to the Voluntary Dispute
5
Resolution Program (VDRP) is requested, the parties shall file said request jointly, in writing.
6
Counsel are instructed to have a principal with full settlement authority present at
7
any Settlement Conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms. Each judge
8
has different requirements for the submission of settlement conference statements; the appropriate
9
instructions will be sent to you after the settlement judge is assigned.
10
X.
11
MODIFICATION OF STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
12
Procedure, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order shall not be modified except by leave of court
13
upon a showing of good cause. Agreement of the parties by stipulation alone does not constitute
14
good cause. Except in extraordinary circumstances, unavailability of witnesses or counsel does
15
not constitute good cause.
16
As noted, the assigned magistrate judge is authorized to modify only the discovery
17
dates shown above to the extent any such modification does not impact the balance of the
18
schedule of the case.
19
XI.
20
21
22
23
OBJECTIONS TO STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
This Status Order will become final without further order of the court unless
objections are filed within fourteen (14) calendar days of service of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 18, 2018.
24
25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
26
27
28
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?