McClintock v. Cooper et al

Filing 90

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/27/2021 DENYING plaintiff's 89 motion for leave to amend, without prejudice. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOHN McCLINTOCK,

12
13
14

No. 2: 18-cv-0560 JAM KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

T. COOPER, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18
19

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with this civil rights action seeking relief
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On January 25, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend his complaint. Plaintiff’s

20

motion was not, however, accompanied by a proposed amended complaint. As a prisoner,

21

plaintiff’s pleadings are subject to evaluation by this court pursuant to the in forma pauperis

22

statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Because plaintiff did not submit a proposed amended complaint,

23

the court is unable to evaluate it.

24

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s January 25, 2021 motion for

25

leave to amend (ECF No. 89) is denied without prejudice.

26

Dated: January 27, 2021

27
Mc560.ame(2)

28
1