McClintock v. Cooper et al

Filing 92

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/10/2021 GRANTING 91 Motion for Extension of Time; ORDERING Defendant J. Cantu to serve her revised interrogatory responses by 3/5/2021; and RESETTING the dispositive motion deadline to 4/20/2021. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN McCLINTOCK, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2: 18-cv-0560 JAM KJN P v. ORDER T. COOPER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 17 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is defendants’ motion for an extension of time to 19 serve plaintiff with revised interrogatory responses and to file a dispositive motion. (ECF No. 20 91.) 21 The dispositive motion deadline is February 20, 2021. (ECF No. 85.) 22 On December 4, 2020, the undersigned granted plaintiff’s motion to compel as to revised 23 interrogatories addressed to defendants L. Cantu and J. Cantu. (ECF No. 83.) The undersigned 24 ordered defendants to serve the revised interrogatory responses within thirty days. (Id.) 25 In the pending motion, defendants state that defense counsel has come across information 26 indicating there was a second Officer J. Cantu who worked in plaintiff’s assigned facility at Mule 27 Creek State Prison (“MCSP”) during the events at issue. (ECF No. 91 at 1.) Defense counsel and 28 plaintiff met and conferred several times to determine which Officer J. Cantu plaintiff intended to 1 1 sue. (Id. at 1-2.) Defense counsel requires additional time to prepare a stipulation to have the 2 correct Officer J. Cantu substituted into the case, and to have that stipulation reviewed and signed 3 by plaintiff. (Id. at 2.) Defendants also require additional time to file an amended answer on this 4 second Officer J. Cantu’s behalf and to serve plaintiff with revised interrogatory responses from 5 the correct defendant J. Cantu. (Id.) 6 Defendants request an extension of time until March 5, 2021, for the correct defendant J. 7 Cantu to serve her revised interrogatory responses. Defendant request that the court take the 8 dispositive motion deadline off calendar, to be reset after the Officer J. Cantu issue has been 9 resolved. 10 The undersigned appreciates defense counsel’s actions in resolving the issue regarding 11 defendant J. Cantu. However, rather than vacating the dispositive motion deadline, the 12 undersigned extends this deadline by sixty days. If defendants require additional time to file their 13 summary judgment motion, they may file a request for extension of time. 14 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 15 1. 16 2. Defendant J. Cantu shall serve her revised interrogatory responses by March 5, 2021; 17 3. The dispositive motion deadline is reset to April 20, 2021. 18 Defendants’ motion for extension of time (ECF No. 91) is granted; Dated: February 10, 2021 19 20 21 Mcclin560.eot(3) 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?