Taft v. Martinez
Filing
6
ORDER ADOPTING 5 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in Full signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 5/29/2018 DISMISSING this action as duplicative of Case No. 1:18-cv-0412 DAD JLT P. CASE CLOSED. (Fabillaran, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BENJAMIN R. TAFT,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:18-cv-0564 WBS AC P
v.
ORDER
JOEL MARTINEZ,
15
Respondents.
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas
17
18
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On April 25, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
20
21
were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 5. Petitioner has
23
not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed April 25, 2018, are adopted in full;
27
28
////
1
1
2
2. This action is dismissed as duplicative of Case No. 1:18-cv-0412 DAD JLT P.
Dated: May 29, 2018
3
4
5
6
7
Taft0564.800.hc
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?