Peacock v. Pabst Brewing Company, LLC

Filing 74

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 08/09/23 CONTINUING the Motion Hearing to 9/28/2023 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 10 (DJC) before District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta.(Licea Chavez, V)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 OREN BITAN (CA Bar No. 251056) MARK T. CRAMER (CA Bar No. 198952) Email: obitan@buchalter.com mcramer@buchalter.com BUCHALTER A Professional Corporation 1000 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1500 Los Angeles, CA 90017-2457 Telephone: 213.891.0700 Fax: 213.896.0400 ELIZABETH LEE BECK (CA Bar No. 233742) elizabeth@beckandlee.com BECK & LEE TRIAL LAWYERS 8306 Mills Dr., Unit 248 Miami, FL 33183 Tel: 305-234-2060 Fax: 786-664-3334 CULLIN O’BRIEN FL Bar No. 597341 (admitted pro hac vice) cullin@cullinobrienlaw.com CULLIN O’BRIEN LAW, P.A. 6541 NE 21st Way Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33108 Tel: 561-676-6370 Fax: 561-320-0285 JESSICA M. HAWK (CA Bar No. 289391) Email: jhawk@buchalter.com BUCHALTER A Professional Corporation 655 W. Broadway, Suite 1625 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: 619.219.5430 Attorneys for Defendant PABST BREWING COMPANY, LLC Counsel for Plaintiff and the Putative Class 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Case No: 2:18-cv-00568-DJC-CKD BRENDAN PEACOCK, on Behalf of Himself, and All Others Similarly Situated, JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff, v. Current Hearing Date: September 14, 2023 at 1:30 p.m. PABST BREWING COMPANY, LLC, Proposed Hearing Date: September 28, 2023 at 1:30 p.m. Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 BUCHALTER JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE CASE NO: 2:18-CV-00568-DJC-CKD A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION LOS ANGELES BN 77480599v2 Plaintiff Brendan Peacock (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Pabst Brewing Company, 1 2 LLC (“Pabst,” and together with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), by and through their respective 3 undersigned counsel, state as follows: 1. 4 5 Pabst filed a motion for summary judgment on July 19, 2023 with a noticed hearing date of September 14, 2023. (ECF No. 71.) 2. 6 Defendant does not require a hearing on Pabst’s motion.1 Pabst’s notice 7 of motion states: “Pabst is amenable to submitting this motion for decision without oral 8 argument.” (ECF No. 71 at page 2 lines 8-9.) 3. 9 In the event the Court decides to hold a hearing on Pabst’s motion for 10 summary judgment, Plaintiff’s counsel is not available on the noticed hearing date of 11 September 14, 2023. 4. 12 Therefore, should the Court elect to a hold a hearing in the above matter, 13 the Parties hereby stipulate and request to continue the hearing on Pabst’s motion for 14 summary judgment to September 28, 2023 at 1:30 p.m. 15 DATED: August 9, 2023 16 BUCHALTER A Professional Corporation 17 By: 18 19 20 /s/ Oren Bitan OREN BITAN MARK T. CRAMER JESSICA M. HAWK Attorneys for Defendant PABST BREWING COMPANY, LLC 21 22 BECK & LEE, P.A. 23 24 By: 25 Attorneys for Plaintiff 26 27 28 /s/ Elizabeth Lee Beck ELIZABETH LEE BECK 1 Plaintiff takes no position but believes that a hearing on the matter could be helpful to the Court. 1 BUCHALTER JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE CASE NO: 2:18-CV-00568-DJC-CKD A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION LOS ANGELES BN 77480599v2 ORDER 1 2 The Court, having reviewed the Parties’ stipulation and for good cause shown, 3 hereby issues an Order continuing the hearing on Pabst’s motion for summary judgment 4 (ECF No. 71) to September 28, 2023 at 1:30 p.m. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 DATED: August 9, 2023 9 10 /s/ Daniel J. Calabretta THE HONORABLE DANIEL J. CALABRETTA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 BUCHALTER JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE CASE NO: 2:18-CV-00568-DJC-CKD A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION LOS ANGELES BN 77480599v2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?