Cornejo v. Lizarraga

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 11/08/18 STRIKING claims 2,3 and 5 from the petition at petitioner's request and DENYING 13 Motion to Dismiss. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 30 days of the date of this order. Petitioner may file a traverse within 30 days of service of respondent's answer. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ADAM CORNEJO, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:18-CV-0571-KJM-DMC-P v. ORDER JOE LIZARRAGA, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with retained counsel, brings this petition 17 18 for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the court is 19 respondent’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 13). Respondent argues the instant petition must be dismissed as a mixed petition 20 21 containing exhausted and unexhausted claims unless petitioner is willing to strike unexhausted 22 claims two, three, and five. See Doc. 13. Petitioner has filed a statement indicating he is willing 23 to strike claims two, three, and five and proceed on the remaining exhausted claims. See Doc. 15. 24 Good cause appearing therefor, claims two, three, and five will be stricken from the petition at 25 petitioner’s request and respondent’s motion will be denied as moot. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. At petitioner’s request, claims two, three, and five are stricken from the 4 2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 13) is denied as moot; 5 3. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 30 days of the date of 4. Petitioner may file a traverse within 30 days of service of respondent’s 3 6 petition; this order; and 7 8 answer. 9 10 Dated: November 8, 2018 ____________________________________ DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?