Cornejo v. Lizarraga
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 11/08/18 STRIKING claims 2,3 and 5 from the petition at petitioner's request and DENYING 13 Motion to Dismiss. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 30 days of the date of this order. Petitioner may file a traverse within 30 days of service of respondent's answer. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ADAM CORNEJO,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:18-CV-0571-KJM-DMC-P
v.
ORDER
JOE LIZARRAGA,
15
Respondent.
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with retained counsel, brings this petition
17
18
for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the court is
19
respondent’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 13).
Respondent argues the instant petition must be dismissed as a mixed petition
20
21
containing exhausted and unexhausted claims unless petitioner is willing to strike unexhausted
22
claims two, three, and five. See Doc. 13. Petitioner has filed a statement indicating he is willing
23
to strike claims two, three, and five and proceed on the remaining exhausted claims. See Doc. 15.
24
Good cause appearing therefor, claims two, three, and five will be stricken from the petition at
25
petitioner’s request and respondent’s motion will be denied as moot.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
At petitioner’s request, claims two, three, and five are stricken from the
4
2.
Respondent’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 13) is denied as moot;
5
3.
Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 30 days of the date of
4.
Petitioner may file a traverse within 30 days of service of respondent’s
3
6
petition;
this order; and
7
8
answer.
9
10
Dated: November 8, 2018
____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?