Cornejo v. Lizarraga

Filing 23

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/30/2021 ADOPTING in FULL 21 Findings and Recommendations. DENYING Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus 1 . The Court DECLINES to issue a Certificate of Appealability, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ADAM CORNEJO, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:18-CV-0571-KJM-DMC-P v. ORDER JOE LIZZARAGA, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with retained counsel, brings this petition 18 for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge as provided by Eastern District of California local rules. 20 On February 17, 2021, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations, 21 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections 22 within the time specified therein. Petitioner has filed timely objections to the findings. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, 23 24 this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds 25 the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. 28 The findings and recommendations filed February 17, 2021, are adopted in full; 1 1 2. Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, is denied; 2 3. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability; and 3 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. 4 DATED: September 30, 2021. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?