Chambers v. McFadden-Jensen et al

Filing 35

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/21/2020 ADOPTING IN FULL 23 Findings and Recommendations. All Defendants other than Defendant Ambler are DISMISSED. C. Drake, B. Holmes, J. Lizarraga, R. McFadden-Jensen, R. Roy, B. Stacy, M. Williams, P. Burton and J. Dowdy terminated. (Tupolo, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LAMBERT G. CHAMBERS,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:18-cv-0613-TLN-CKD

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

R. MCFADDEN-JENSEN, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff Lambert G. Chambers (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this

18

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

19

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On March 4, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which was

21

served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and

22

recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 23.) Plaintiff has not filed

23

objections to the Findings and Recommendations. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any

24

findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The

25

magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified

26

School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

27
28

Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed March 4, 2020 (ECF No. 23), are adopted in

3

full; and

4

2. All Defendants other than Defendant Ambler are DISMISSED.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

DATED: July 21, 2020

7
8
9

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2