Chambers v. McFadden-Jensen et al

Filing 43

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/07/21 DENYING 42 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 LAMBERT G. CHAMBERS, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:18-cv-0613 TLN CKD P v. ORDER R. MCFADDEN-JENSEN, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. District courts lack authority to 16 17 require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States 18 Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request an 19 attorney to voluntarily represent such a plaintiff. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 20 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 21 1990). When determining whether “exceptional circumstances” exist, the court must consider 22 plaintiff’s likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his 23 claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 24 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009) (district court did not abuse discretion in declining to appoint counsel). 25 The burden of demonstrating exceptional circumstances is on the plaintiff. Id. Circumstances 26 common to most prisoners, such as lack of legal education and limited law library access, do not 27 establish exceptional circumstances that warrant a request for voluntary assistance of counsel. 28 ///// 1 Having considered the factors under Palmer, the court finds that plaintiff has failed to 2 meet his burden of demonstrating exceptional circumstances warranting the appointment of 3 counsel at this time. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for the appointment of 4 5 counsel (ECF No. 22) is denied. 6 Dated: January 7, 2021 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 1/bh cham0613.31 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?