Paton v. Brockenborough, et al.

Filing 3

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the SACRAMENTO Division. New Case Number 2:18-cv-00628 DB (PC). Old Case Number 1:18-cv-00370 EPG (PC), signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 3/21/2018.(Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 Case No. 1:18-cv-00370-EPG (PC) EARLIE PATON, Plaintiff, v. R. BROCKENBOROUGH, et al., ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. In his complaint, Plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by Defendants. The alleged violations took place in Amador County, which is part of the Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Therefore, the complaint should have been filed in the Sacramento Division. 23 Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), when a civil action has not been commenced in the proper 24 court, the Court may, on its own motion, transfer the action to the proper court. Therefore, this 25 action will be transferred to the Sacramento Division. This Court will not rule on Plaintiff's 26 27 application to proceed in forma pauperis. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 1 1 2 3 California sitting in Sacramento; and 2. All future filings shall refer to the new Sacramento case number assigned and shall be filed at: 4 United States District Court Eastern District of California 501 "I" Street, Suite 4-200 Sacramento, CA 95814 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 Dated: March 21, 2018 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?