Ramirez et al v. County of El Dorado et al

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 09/13/18 DISMISSING the claims against defendant Hoffman without leave to amend; case is REFERRED back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Benson, A.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11 WILLIAM RAMIREZ, et al.,

No. 2:18-cv-00632-KJM-GGH

12

ORDER

Plaintiffs,

13

v.

14 COUNTY OF EL DORADO, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
17
18

Plaintiffs appear in this action pro se and in forma pauperis. They filed a

19

complaint on March 23, 2018, alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. sections 1983, 1995(3) and 1986

20

and related state claims. ECF No. 1.

21

On May 7, 2018, the magistrate judge issued an order with findings and

22

recommendations, recommending that the claims against defendant Hoffman be dismissed

23

without leave to amend as barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and judicial immunity

24

principles. ECF No. 4. The parties had twenty-one days to file written objections to the

25

recommendations and were warned that failure to object could waive their rights to appeal this

26

court’s order. Id. at 4:16-22. No objections have been filed.

27

/////

28
1

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304,

2

this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court

3

ADOPTS the findings and recommendations.

4

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

5

1.

The claims against defendant Hoffman are dismissed without leave to

2.

This case is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further

6
7
8
9
10

amend; and

pretrial proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: September 13, 2018.

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2