Ramirez et al v. County of El Dorado et al
Filing
58
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/16/2020 ADOPTING 54 Findings and Recommendations. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
WILLIAM RAMIREZ AND STACEY
RAMIREZ,
Plaintiffs,
13
ORDER
v.
14
15
No. 2:18-CV-00632-KJM-CKD
COUNTY OF EL DORADO, ET AL.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
On April 6, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which
19
contained notice to plaintiffs that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be
20
filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 54.) Plaintiffs filed objections on April 20, 2020, (ECF No.
21
55), and defendants responded to the objections on May 4, 2020. (ECF No. 56.) Plaintiffs filed a
22
further reply to defendants’ response, which the court did not authorize; the court nevertheless has
23
reviewed the reply. (ECF No 57.)
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the
26
findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The Findings and Recommendations filed April 6, 2020, are ADOPTED;
3
2. This action is dismissed with prejudice; and
4
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
5
DATED: August 16, 2020.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?