Scott v. California Health Care Facility

Filing 18

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 06/26/18 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

HOWARD SCOTT,

12
13
14
15
16

No. 2:18-cv-0635 CKD P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER AND

CALIFORNIA HEALTH CARE
FACILITY, et al.,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendants.

17

By order filed May 15, 2018, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to

18

file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has

19

not filed an amended complaint.

20
21
22
23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district
court judge to this case; and
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See
Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

24

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

25

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after

26

being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with

27

the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

28

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time
1

1

waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir.

2

1991).

3

Dated: June 26, 2018

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9

1
scot0635.fta

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2