Scott v. California Health Care Facility

Filing 33

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/10/2021 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

HOWARD SCOTT,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:18-cv-0635 TLN CKD P

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CALIFORNIA HEALTH CARE
FACILITY,
Defendant.

16
17

On October 29, 2020, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed with leave to amend.

18
19

Plaintiff was granted until February 1, 2021 to file a second amended complaint and has not done

20

so. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

21

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

22
23

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

24

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

25

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

26

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

27

time /////

28

/////
1

1

waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir.

2

1991).

3

Dated: February 10, 2021

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9

1
scot0635.fta

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2