Scott v. California Health Care Facility
Filing
34
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/19/21 ADOPTING in full 33 Findings and Recommendations and DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
Case 2:18-cv-00635-TLN-CKD Document 34 Filed 03/22/21 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
HOWARD SCOTT,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:18-cv-00635-TLN-CKD
v.
ORDER
CALIFORNIA HEALTH CARE
FACILITY,
16
Defendant.
17
18
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
19
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
20
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On February 11, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
22
which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the
23
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed
24
objections to the findings and recommendations.
The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602
25
26
F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.
27
See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
28
///
1
Case 2:18-cv-00635-TLN-CKD Document 34 Filed 03/22/21 Page 2 of 2
1
Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be
2
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The magistrate judge’s February 11, 2021 findings and recommendations are
5
ADOPTED IN FULL; and
6
2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice.
7
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.
8
DATED: March 19, 2021
9
10
11
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?