Fields v. Director of CDCR et al
Filing
70
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 03/29/22 ADOPTING 69 Findings and Recommendations in full GRANTING 50 62 Motions for Summary Judgment. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CARLTON DEWAYNE FIELDS,
12
13
No. 2: 18-cv-0653 MCE KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
14
DIRECTOR OF CDCR, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On March 7, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections thereto
22
were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. ECF No. 69. Neither party filed objections to the
23
findings and recommendations.
24
The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602
25
F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.
26
See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having
27
reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record
28
and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed March 7, 2022 (ECF No. 69), are ADOPTED
3
4
5
in full;
2. Defendants’ summary judgment motion and supplemental summary judgment motion
(ECF Nos. 50, 62) are GRANTED; and
6
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
DATED: March 29, 2022
10
11
12
13
14
____________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?